Added html language implementation

[AndreasArvidsson]

No description provided.

[pokey]

This looks good with a couple minor comments.

• Also would be good to add a test to make sure that plaintext tag angle pair works the same as in html

[pokey]

I wonder if "clear" should leave the angles. Can't decide

[AndreasArvidsson]

Take and clear always have the same range so far. I don't want to change that

[AndreasArvidsson]

I added a plaintext version as well
Clear bounds does not work correctly in plaintext
<hr/> => hr
</body> => /body

[pokey]

I added a plaintext version as well Clear bounds does not work correctly in plaintext <hr/> => hr </body> => /body

yeah was worried about that. what happens if you switch the order like this?

[pokey]

Ok looks great. I left one more thing. Also thought of one more quick test case:

• test having parens inside a string to make sure it properly reverts to text-based when inside a string
• Also parens inside a comment

[pokey]

Ok looks good with one last question

[pokey]

Will an attribute value always be a string?

[AndreasArvidsson]

No. But it's the only type that can contain other matching pairs

[pokey]

Ok so this is a hack, then, right? Because there might be things that are children that are not strings? It's ok if it's a hack, we should just document that in a comment

[pokey]

You could also just check node parent type as well maybe?

[pokey]

Or check that it has first and last child of type "?

[AndreasArvidsson]

I wouldn't say it's a hack. It is a type that can contain text based matching pairs. But I can't contain any children in the tree sitter as far as I know. I tried with few different values and it all behaved as expected.