Skip to content

Conversation

@Faolain
Copy link
Contributor

@Faolain Faolain commented Jun 10, 2025

Problem
Previously a run of the following standard code in a python script like

image

caused the following error & warnings:
image

Cause
From Claude:
Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 8 05 52 PM
Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 8 07 11 PM
Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 8 07 28 PM

Solution
Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 8 08 02 PM

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a comprehensive architecture document detailing the design, data flow, concurrency model, and integration points of the py-hamt library.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved asynchronous session cleanup to safely manage resources across multiple event loops without errors.
    • Simplified session closing logic to ensure robust cleanup and avoid manual session closure.
  • Tests

    • Added asynchronous tests verifying session management and cleanup behavior in multi-event-loop environments, including handling of exceptions during session closure.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Walkthrough

A new architecture document for the py-hamt library was added, providing a comprehensive overview of its design and implementation. Enhancements were made to the KuboCAS session management in py_hamt/store.py, improving asynchronous cleanup across multiple event loops with better connector options and exception handling. New asynchronous tests were introduced to validate session cleanup, context manager behavior, no-running-loop scenarios, and exception resilience during session closure. A test cleanup was simplified to rely on KuboCAS’s proper session closing.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Architecture.md Added a detailed architecture document describing the design, implementation, and integration points of py-hamt.
py_hamt/store.py Improved KuboCAS session management: enhanced _loop_session with custom TCPConnector and rewrote aclose for robust multi-loop cleanup and exception handling.
tests/test_async.py Added new async tests for KuboCAS to verify safe session cleanup across event loops, context manager usage, no-running-loop scenarios, and exception resilience during session closure.
tests/test_kubocas_session.py Simplified cleanup in test_distinct_loops_get_distinct_sessions by removing explicit session close and asserting session is closed after aclose().

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant MainLoop as Main Event Loop
    participant ThreadLoop as Thread Event Loop
    participant KuboCAS as KuboCAS
    participant Session as aiohttp.ClientSession

    Test->>MainLoop: Create KuboCAS instance
    MainLoop->>KuboCAS: Request session (current loop)
    KuboCAS->>Session: Create session for main loop
    Test->>ThreadLoop: In thread, request session
    ThreadLoop->>KuboCAS: Request session (thread loop)
    KuboCAS->>Session: Create session for thread loop
    Test->>KuboCAS: Call aclose()
    KuboCAS->>Session: Close sessions for all owned loops
    KuboCAS->>Test: Cleanup complete
Loading

Poem

In the warren of code where the HAMT trees grow,
Now sessions are tidied, no matter the flow.
Async loops may differ, but cleanup is neat,
With tests that ensure no cross-loop defeat.
Architecture’s mapped, and the rabbits all cheer—
For robust, tidy storage, the future is here!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0128b0f and 2e55740.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • py_hamt/store.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_kubocas_session.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • py_hamt/store.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/test_kubocas_session.py (1)

101-101: LGTM! Test simplification reflects improved session management.

The change from manual conditional session closing to a direct assertion demonstrates that the enhanced KuboCAS.aclose() implementation now properly handles cross-event-loop session cleanup. This simplification makes the test cleaner while effectively verifying the expected behavior.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
tests/test_async.py (1)

16-16: Consider testing through public interfaces instead of private methods.

While testing private methods (_loop_session()) and attributes (_session_per_loop) can be necessary for verifying internal behavior, it creates brittle tests that break when implementation details change. Consider whether these behaviors could be tested through public APIs.

Also applies to: 27-27, 40-40, 54-55, 59-60

py_hamt/store.py (1)

256-260: Consider adding tests for edge cases to improve coverage.

The pipeline indicates missing coverage for:

  • Lines 256-260: The case when no event loop is running
  • Lines 281-283: Exception handling during session closure

While these are edge cases, adding tests would ensure robustness.

Would you like me to help generate test cases for these uncovered scenarios?

Also applies to: 281-283

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Triggered on push from Faolain to branch/tag fix/async-session-runtime-error

[error] 256-260: Coverage failure: lines 256-260 are missing coverage.

Architecture.md (3)

28-28: Fix grammar: "mode uses" instead of "modes uses".

-- Supports both read-only and read-write modes
-- Uses asyncio locks for thread safety in write mode
+- Supports both read-only and read-write modes
+- Uses asyncio locks for thread safety in write mode
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “modes use” or “mode uses”?
Context: ... Supports both read-only and read-write modes - Uses asyncio locks for thread safety in writ...

(NNS_USES)


120-120: Add missing article "a".

-- **Solution**: Use single event loop for all write operations
+- **Solution**: Use a single event loop for all write operations
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~120-~120: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ... not threading.Lock - Solution: Use single event loop for all write operations ##...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)


135-138: Fix multiple grammar issues in pruning section.

-- **Problem**: Deletions can leave empty nodes in tree
-- **Gotcha**: Empty nodes are automatically pruned except root
-- **Why**: Content addressing means identical empty nodes have same hash
-- **Solution**: Pruning is automatic, but be aware root can become empty
+- **Problem**: Deletions can leave empty nodes in the tree
+- **Gotcha**: Empty nodes are automatically pruned except the root
+- **Why**: Content addressing means identical empty nodes have the same hash
+- **Solution**: Pruning is automatic, but be aware the root can become empty
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~135-~135: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...m**: Deletions can leave empty nodes in tree - Gotcha: Empty nodes are automatic...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[uncategorized] ~136-~136: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...y nodes are automatically pruned except root - Why: Content addressing means ide...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[grammar] ~137-~137: Possible agreement error -- use the past participle here.
Context: ...g means identical empty nodes have same hash - Solution: Pruning is automatic, b...

(HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT)


[uncategorized] ~138-~138: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...n**: Pruning is automatic, but be aware root can become empty ### 6. Serialization ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PREPOSITION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 342e545 and 3543633.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Architecture.md (1 hunks)
  • py_hamt/store.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_async.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Triggered on push from Faolain to branch/tag fix/async-session-runtime-error
py_hamt/store.py

[error] 256-260: Coverage failure: lines 256-260 are missing coverage.


[error] 281-283: Coverage failure: lines 281-283 are missing coverage.

🪛 LanguageTool
Architecture.md

[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “modes use” or “mode uses”?
Context: ... Supports both read-only and read-write modes - Uses asyncio locks for thread safety in writ...

(NNS_USES)


[uncategorized] ~120-~120: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ... not threading.Lock - Solution: Use single event loop for all write operations ##...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)


[style] ~130-~130: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...ance vs memory trade-offs - Gotcha: Very small bucket sizes (1) force deep trees, larg...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~135-~135: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...m**: Deletions can leave empty nodes in tree - Gotcha: Empty nodes are automatic...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[uncategorized] ~136-~136: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...y nodes are automatically pruned except root - Why: Content addressing means ide...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[grammar] ~137-~137: Possible agreement error -- use the past participle here.
Context: ...g means identical empty nodes have same hash - Solution: Pruning is automatic, b...

(HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT)


[uncategorized] ~138-~138: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...n**: Pruning is automatic, but be aware root can become empty ### 6. Serialization ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PREPOSITION)


[uncategorized] ~173-~173: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...e**: O(log₂₅₆ n) average case, O(depth) worst case - Iteration: O(n) for all keys/valu...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[typographical] ~175-~175: If specifying a range, consider using an en dash instead of a hyphen.
Context: ...keys/values - Tree depth: Typically 1-4 levels for most datasets ### Space Com...

(HYPHEN_TO_EN)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
Architecture.md

18-18: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
py_hamt/store.py (2)

214-236: LGTM! Good improvements to session cleanup configuration.

The addition of force_close=True and enable_cleanup_closed=True to the TCPConnector should help prevent unclosed session warnings by ensuring connections are properly cleaned up.


240-290: Excellent implementation of multi-loop session cleanup!

The rewritten aclose method properly handles the complex scenario of sessions existing across multiple event loops. The separation of sessions by loop ownership and the careful handling of cross-loop limitations is well thought out.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Triggered on push from Faolain to branch/tag fix/async-session-runtime-error

[error] 256-260: Coverage failure: lines 256-260 are missing coverage.


[error] 281-283: Coverage failure: lines 281-283 are missing coverage.

Architecture.md (1)

1-214: Excellent architecture documentation!

This comprehensive document provides valuable insights into the py-hamt library's design, implementation details, and potential gotchas. The clear structure and detailed explanations will be very helpful for developers working with this library.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~28-~28: Did you mean “modes use” or “mode uses”?
Context: ... Supports both read-only and read-write modes - Uses asyncio locks for thread safety in writ...

(NNS_USES)


[uncategorized] ~120-~120: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ... not threading.Lock - Solution: Use single event loop for all write operations ##...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)


[style] ~130-~130: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...ance vs memory trade-offs - Gotcha: Very small bucket sizes (1) force deep trees, larg...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~135-~135: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...m**: Deletions can leave empty nodes in tree - Gotcha: Empty nodes are automatic...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[uncategorized] ~136-~136: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...y nodes are automatically pruned except root - Why: Content addressing means ide...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[grammar] ~137-~137: Possible agreement error -- use the past participle here.
Context: ...g means identical empty nodes have same hash - Solution: Pruning is automatic, b...

(HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT)


[uncategorized] ~138-~138: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...n**: Pruning is automatic, but be aware root can become empty ### 6. Serialization ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PREPOSITION)


[uncategorized] ~173-~173: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...e**: O(log₂₅₆ n) average case, O(depth) worst case - Iteration: O(n) for all keys/valu...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[typographical] ~175-~175: If specifying a range, consider using an en dash instead of a hyphen.
Context: ...keys/values - Tree depth: Typically 1-4 levels for most datasets ### Space Com...

(HYPHEN_TO_EN)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

18-18: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (342e545) to head (2e55740).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #66   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            5         5           
  Lines          597       603    +6     
=========================================
+ Hits           597       603    +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tests/test_async.py (1)

213-251: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Problematic use of fake loop object for testing.

Using object() as a fake event loop in line 234 may not be the best approach as it doesn't behave like a real event loop and could lead to unpredictable behavior.

Consider creating a more realistic test scenario or using a proper mock event loop:

-    kubo._session_per_loop[object()] = sess1  # Fake a second loop
+    # Create a second real loop for more realistic testing
+    import weakref
+    fake_loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
+    kubo._session_per_loop[fake_loop] = sess1
+    fake_loop.close()  # Close immediately to simulate closed loop
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_async.py (2)

135-136: Remove misplaced comment.

This comment appears to be a leftover from development and doesn't belong in this file.

-# tests/test_kubocas_session.py (add this test to the existing file)
-

174-211: Consider consolidating similar error handling tests.

This test is very similar to the previous one. Consider refactoring to reduce duplication or clearly document the difference in scenarios being tested.

The main difference appears to be testing multiple calls to close the same session, but this could be combined with the previous test or made more distinct.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d596e8f and 400297e3736b7376ad8666a7ff797d2b9c6b4fdf.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_async.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/test_async.py (6)

1-8: LGTM: Clean import structure and appropriate test setup.

The imports are well-organized and include all necessary modules for the async testing scenarios.


10-77: Comprehensive cross-loop testing with robust cleanup logic.

This test effectively validates the core issue addressed in the PR - handling sessions across multiple event loops without raising "attached to a different loop" errors. The cleanup logic is thorough and prevents resource leaks.


78-96: Good simulation of the real-world usage scenario.

This test validates the exact context manager pattern that users would typically employ, ensuring the fix works in practical scenarios.


98-117: Effective use of mocking for edge case testing.

The test properly simulates the no-running-loop scenario using unittest.mock.patch, which is appropriate for this edge case.


119-133: Simple and effective test for already-closed sessions.

This test ensures graceful handling of sessions that are already closed, which is an important edge case.


138-172: Excellent error handling test with proper exception suppression.

This test correctly validates that aclose() gracefully handles session close failures without propagating exceptions, which is crucial for robust cleanup.

@Faolain Faolain force-pushed the fix/async-session-runtime-error branch from 400297e to 0128b0f Compare June 10, 2025 04:36
@Faolain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Faolain commented Jun 10, 2025

Looks like codex solved it (?)

@Faolain Faolain merged commit 1d5aeca into main Jun 10, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants