Skip to content

fix: name build-check step to match branch protection#43

Closed
dacrab wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/ci-check-names
Closed

fix: name build-check step to match branch protection#43
dacrab wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/ci-check-names

Conversation

@dacrab
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@dacrab dacrab commented Apr 19, 2026

Fixes the branch protection issue where required check 'build-check' doesn't match the actual check names.

This adds an explicit name to the build step so it shows as 'build-check' instead of 'build-check (linux, amd64)' etc.

This will unblock Dependabot PRs #40, #41, #42 which have all checks passing but can't auto-merge.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI workflow configuration for improved clarity and maintainability. No end-user impact.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 19, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4ee7279f-23f6-4297-b640-dc835794b935

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e51e5d and 87e2a20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A CI workflow step in the build-check job was renamed to include an explicit step name, improving clarity in workflow logs while maintaining the identical build command and execution parameters.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Configuration
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Added explicit step name (build-check) to the build job step for improved log readability and workflow transparency.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A workflow step gets a name so clear,
No longer nameless, the labels appear!
The build runs the same, no logic askew,
Just prettier logs for the reviewer's view! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: naming the build-check step to align with branch protection requirements.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/ci-check-names

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@dacrab
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

dacrab commented Apr 19, 2026

Closing: Fixed via branch protection update instead. Updated required checks to match actual check names.

@dacrab dacrab closed this Apr 19, 2026
@dacrab dacrab deleted the fix/ci-check-names branch April 19, 2026 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant