Skip to content

Conversation

@samtrion
Copy link
Member

@samtrion samtrion commented Jul 7, 2025

No description provided.

@samtrion samtrion requested a review from Copilot July 7, 2025 19:37
@samtrion samtrion self-assigned this Jul 7, 2025
@samtrion samtrion added the type:feature Indicates a new feature or enhancement to be added. label Jul 7, 2025

This comment was marked as outdated.

@samtrion samtrion requested a review from Copilot July 7, 2025 22:47

This comment was marked as outdated.

@samtrion samtrion force-pushed the feature/finished-version-one branch 2 times, most recently from 8bb8823 to e5189fa Compare August 21, 2025 06:50
@samtrion samtrion force-pushed the feature/finished-version-one branch from e5189fa to 8e2c623 Compare August 21, 2025 10:54
@samtrion samtrion requested a review from Copilot August 21, 2025 10:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9cfd74d) to head (2f7249a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #131   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         3    +1     
  Lines           83       114   +31     
  Branches        26        30    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits            83       114   +31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

This comment was marked as outdated.

@samtrion samtrion requested a review from Copilot August 21, 2025 11:38
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR completes the first version implementation of the NetEvolve.Extensions.Data library with comprehensive data access extensions. The implementation adds new DbDataReaderExtensions with type-safe generic methods for field value retrieval, both synchronous and asynchronous, along with null-safe variants that provide default values for null database fields.

  • Adds complete DbDataReaderExtensions class with generic field value methods and async support
  • Creates comprehensive test suites including unit tests and integration tests using SQLite
  • Updates documentation with detailed API reference and usage examples

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/NetEvolve.Extensions.Data/DbDataReaderExtensions.cs Implements new extension methods for DbDataReader with generic type-safe access and async operations
tests/NetEvolve.Extensions.Data.Tests.Unit/DbDataReaderExtensionsTests.cs Comprehensive unit tests for all DbDataReaderExtensions methods with mocked dependencies
tests/NetEvolve.Extensions.Data.Tests.Integration/ Integration test projects and classes for real-world testing against SQLite database
src/NetEvolve.Extensions.Data/IDataRecordExtensions.cs Updates documentation comments to improve clarity and consistency
README.md Major documentation update with comprehensive usage examples and API reference
Public API snapshots Updates to reflect the new public API surface for all target frameworks
Solution files Migration from .sln to .slnx format with updated project references

@samtrion samtrion merged commit 3a3422c into main Aug 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@samtrion samtrion deleted the feature/finished-version-one branch August 21, 2025 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:feature Indicates a new feature or enhancement to be added.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants