Skip to content

Conversation

@samtrion
Copy link
Contributor

@samtrion samtrion commented Nov 26, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • CI workflow updated to reference the concrete solution file used for builds.
    • Template synchronization workflow and its configuration removed.
    • Added a minimal solution/manifest file to the repository.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@samtrion samtrion self-assigned this Nov 26, 2025
@samtrion samtrion added state:ready for merge Indicates that a pull request has been reviewed and approved, and is ready to be merged into the mai type:chore Indicates some housework that needs to be done. labels Nov 26, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Removed template-sync configuration and workflow files, added a minimal solution file, and updated the CI workflow to reference the new concrete solution path instead of a placeholder.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Removed template sync configuration
​.github/template-sync.yml, ​.github/workflows/template-sync.yml
Deleted template synchronization configuration and the GitHub Actions workflow that triggered template repo syncing; removed file-exclusion rules and the workflow job invoking the external sync action.
Updated CI workflow
​.github/workflows/cicd.yml
Replaced the placeholder ###SOLUTION### with the concrete solution path ./ForgingBlazor.slnx used by the build step.
New solution file
ForgingBlazor.slnx
Added a minimal solution file containing a root <Solution> element with no inner content.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Pay attention to .github/workflows/cicd.yml to ensure the new solution path matches repository layout and build steps.
  • Confirm removal of template-sync workflow and config is intentional and that no external processes depend on them.

Poem

I'm a rabbit, nibbling files so neat,
Templates hop away down the street,
A tiny solution takes its place,
CI points cleanly to the new space,
Hooray for tidy repo grace! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'chore(solution): Created solution' is vague and does not clearly convey the scope and purpose of the changes, which involve multiple workflow modifications and configuration removals. Revise the title to be more specific about the actual changes, such as 'chore: Update CI workflow and remove template sync configuration' to better reflect the multiple modifications across workflow files and configurations.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 282e790 and bf5885e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ForgingBlazor.slnx (1 hunks)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad78ad7 and 282e790.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/template-sync.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/cicd.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/template-sync.yml (0 hunks)
  • ForgingBlazor.slnx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/template-sync.yml
  • .github/template-sync.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
ForgingBlazor.slnx

[error] 1-1: csharpier check failed: ForgingBlazor.slnx was not formatted. Expected: , Actual: .

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/cicd.yml (1)

35-35: LGTM!

The CI workflow correctly references the new ForgingBlazor.slnx solution file instead of the placeholder. Once the formatting issue in ForgingBlazor.slnx is resolved, this should work as expected.

@samtrion samtrion merged commit eea4ec5 into main Nov 26, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@samtrion samtrion deleted the chore/solution branch November 26, 2025 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state:ready for merge Indicates that a pull request has been reviewed and approved, and is ready to be merged into the mai type:chore Indicates some housework that needs to be done.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants