[Source Check] Phang v. Blanche — ECF 42 versus ECF 59

[danespec]

Canonical GAH dispatch

Phang ECF 59, October 16, 2026 — FBI notes in-camera submission.

Narrow documented distinction

A government docket statement about delivery of redacted handwritten FBI interview notes for in-camera inspection is not proof that a different administrative-record certification obligation has been satisfied. Those are separate docket events and questions.

Source needed

A publicly available, authenticated docket entry or signed order addressing the separate ECF 42 certified-list deadline or a later extension/compliance notice. Quote the exact filing language, date and source citation.

Limits

Do not infer compliance or noncompliance from docket silence. Do not copy redacted survivor information. A claimed hand delivery is not a judicial merits determination.

Open verification question: Has the separate certified record-list requirement been satisfied, extended, or disputed, according to the actual docket?