You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Source Check] JPMorgan's nine SARs — reconcile reporting dates and totals
#126
GAH's published analysis distinguishes seven pre-2019 reports totaling approximately $4.3 million from two reports filed in 2019 that account for roughly $1.283 billion. The filing dates and amounts must not be used as evidence of guilt by themselves.
Exact question for the community
Which original public filings or dated supervisory records establish precisely when each relevant concern was escalated, reported, and acted on?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Source-linked SAR references, independently public Senate materials, contemporaneous bank correspondence, and a dated crosswalk; share no protected SAR text.
What this does not prove
A bank's suspicious-activity reporting is not proof of criminal activity, and aggregate report totals are not all payments to one person.
Source-first participation checklist
Link the original public, lawfully released source, include date, page, EFTA/ECF/Bates identifier and surrounding context.
Separate observable facts from competing hypotheses and identify redactions or gaps.
No survivor or anonymous-litigant identification, private bank/contact details, protected SAR texts, threats, hacked content or unsupported declarations of guilt.
Posts are public as soon as submitted; moderators can remove or lock content but cannot promise confidential reporting, anonymity, or continuous review. A GitHub account is required.
For an ordinary source lead you do not want as a public discussion, use GAH Contact / Source Tips. That email is also not a confidential or encrypted service.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Primary GAH source and public record trail
Jpmorgan Nine Sars Epstein
What the published records support
GAH's published analysis distinguishes seven pre-2019 reports totaling approximately $4.3 million from two reports filed in 2019 that account for roughly $1.283 billion. The filing dates and amounts must not be used as evidence of guilt by themselves.
Exact question for the community
Which original public filings or dated supervisory records establish precisely when each relevant concern was escalated, reported, and acted on?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Source-linked SAR references, independently public Senate materials, contemporaneous bank correspondence, and a dated crosswalk; share no protected SAR text.
What this does not prove
A bank's suspicious-activity reporting is not proof of criminal activity, and aggregate report totals are not all payments to one person.
Source-first participation checklist
All reactions