You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Source Check] Black Family Partners — the $18M draft versus $5.5M closing
#129
GAH reconstructs a draft pricing sequence from $18 million to $5.5 million and records a later reallocation within that same closing amount. A changed proposal is not, alone, proof of impropriety.
Exact question for the community
Which public emails, contract versions, appraisal materials or closing schedules document why the valuations changed and whether any required independent valuation took place?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Original dated draft, counsel correspondence, valuation or governing-document record and exact source locator.
What this does not prove
Do not infer fraud, a side payment, or a concealed transfer solely from a draft-to-final price difference.
Source-first participation checklist
Link the original public, lawfully released source, include date, page, EFTA/ECF/Bates identifier and surrounding context.
Separate observable facts from competing hypotheses and identify redactions or gaps.
No survivor or anonymous-litigant identification, private bank/contact details, protected SAR texts, threats, hacked content or unsupported declarations of guilt.
Posts are public as soon as submitted; moderators can remove or lock content but cannot promise confidential reporting, anonymity, or continuous review. A GitHub account is required.
For an ordinary source lead you do not want as a public discussion, use GAH Contact / Source Tips. That email is also not a confidential or encrypted service.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Primary GAH source and public record trail
Black Family Partners 18M To 5 5M Repricing
What the published records support
GAH reconstructs a draft pricing sequence from $18 million to $5.5 million and records a later reallocation within that same closing amount. A changed proposal is not, alone, proof of impropriety.
Exact question for the community
Which public emails, contract versions, appraisal materials or closing schedules document why the valuations changed and whether any required independent valuation took place?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Original dated draft, counsel correspondence, valuation or governing-document record and exact source locator.
What this does not prove
Do not infer fraud, a side payment, or a concealed transfer solely from a draft-to-final price difference.
Source-first participation checklist
All reactions