[Source Check] Coinbase position — reconcile $3.001M cost with later $15M exit

[danespec]

Primary GAH source and public record trail

Coinbase Return First 15M Exit

What the published records support

GAH's return-first reconstruction compares a recorded $3.001 million position cost with a later $15 million half-position transfer and matching trust credits. The original bank funding path is still not established.

Exact question for the community

Can a publicly released contemporaneous bank debit, subscription record, or investment confirmation identify the initial funding source independently of the eventual proceeds?

What would count as a useful public receipt?

Dated primary funding/closing documents with EFTA/Bates reference and page; records must be lawfully public.

What this does not prove

An economic position and a later exit do not by themselves prove a particular funding bank or an unlawful transaction.

---

Source-first participation checklist

• Link the original public, lawfully released source, include date, page, EFTA/ECF/Bates identifier and surrounding context.
• Separate observable facts from competing hypotheses and identify redactions or gaps.
• No survivor or anonymous-litigant identification, private bank/contact details, protected SAR texts, threats, hacked content or unsupported declarations of guilt.
• Posts are public as soon as submitted; moderators can remove or lock content but cannot promise confidential reporting, anonymity, or continuous review. A GitHub account is required.
• For an ordinary source lead you do not want as a public discussion, use GAH Contact / Source Tips. That email is also not a confidential or encrypted service.
• GAH Community Rules · Explore all investigations.