You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Source Check] Palm Beach 2006 — what do aviation arrivals and phone records establish?
#142
GAH reviews detective narratives and a May 1 affidavit concerning a grand-jury scheduling change and comparison of flight arrivals with telephone records. Those are investigation steps, not new legal findings.
Exact question for the community
Which underlying public arrival log, affidavit exhibit or contemporaneous call-record summary allows independent verification of the specific chronology without exposing private phone numbers?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Authentic public affidavit or exhibit with exact date/page and privacy-redacted identifiers.
What this does not prove
Correlation of aircraft movements and calls does not establish who traveled or why any communication occurred.
Source-first participation checklist
Link the original public, lawfully released source, include date, page, EFTA/ECF/Bates identifier and surrounding context.
Separate observable facts from competing hypotheses and identify redactions or gaps.
No survivor or anonymous-litigant identification, private bank/contact details, protected SAR texts, threats, hacked content or unsupported declarations of guilt.
Posts are public as soon as submitted; moderators can remove or lock content but cannot promise confidential reporting, anonymity, or continuous review. A GitHub account is required.
For an ordinary source lead you do not want as a public discussion, use GAH Contact / Source Tips. That email is also not a confidential or encrypted service.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Primary GAH source and public record trail
Palm Beach 2006 Police Jet Aviation Call Records
What the published records support
GAH reviews detective narratives and a May 1 affidavit concerning a grand-jury scheduling change and comparison of flight arrivals with telephone records. Those are investigation steps, not new legal findings.
Exact question for the community
Which underlying public arrival log, affidavit exhibit or contemporaneous call-record summary allows independent verification of the specific chronology without exposing private phone numbers?
What would count as a useful public receipt?
Authentic public affidavit or exhibit with exact date/page and privacy-redacted identifiers.
What this does not prove
Correlation of aircraft movements and calls does not establish who traveled or why any communication occurred.
Source-first participation checklist
All reactions