Replies: 2 comments
|
Hey there - I am on PAI 5.0 too. Just wanted to know your thoughts on LifeOS compared to PAI 5.0. |
0 replies
|
Thanks @chadif, this is a clean way to keep two harnesses from fighting over |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Claude Code keys everything off ~/.claude, so two harnesses on one Windows machine fight over the same directory. Rather than merge them, I gave each its own WSL2 distro. PAI 5 keeps the distro I already had, LifeOS went into a second one. Different filesystem roots, different ~, no collision. Same Claude subscription, same login, no config surgery.
The ergonomics are better than I expected. Windows Terminal picks up each distro as its own profile, so both show up in the dropdown and in the taskbar jump list, and I launch either system with one click.

File Explorer does the same thing: both appear under the Linux node in the sidebar, so I can browse either tree in a normal window. Windows Terminal will happily use a friendly profile name, so if you rename one, remember the registered distro name is what wsl commands need.

Setting up the second distro, from PowerShell:
wsl --list --online # available images
wsl --install Ubuntu-24.04 # installs to %LOCALAPPDATA%\wsl{guid}
wsl -d Ubuntu-24.04 # first launch prompts for a UNIX user
Then inside the new distro. Proceed with installing LifeOS as a new install.
Both distros also mount /mnt/c, so a folder on the Windows side works as neutral ground. Either way I copy things across as I decide they are worth keeping, instead of committing to a full migration beforeI know whether I am staying. So far it's been going great and was able to get LifeOS up to speed fairly easily including all customizations without compromising my existing install.
All reactions