DAOS-16958 ci: increase timeout for Unit Test with memcheck

[wiliamhuang]

Increase timeout to avoid issues on slow CI nodes with broadwell.

Before requesting gatekeeper:

• Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
• Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
• Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
• Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
• Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

• You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
• The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
• Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
• Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
• All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
• Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
• If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
• Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
• Extra checks if forced landing is requested
  • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
  • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
  • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
• Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

[github-actions]

Ticket title is 'To increase timout for step "Unit Test with memcheck on EL 8.8" in Jenkins'
Status is 'In Review'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16958

[mchaarawi]

you need to add the hpe copyright :-)
the change is fine for me. it is concerning though that our test VMs are that different. at some point we should talk with DCO team to remove the old VMs from commission.

[daltonbohning]

I wonder if this is related to https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/SRE-471, which we've never gotten a resolution for

[daltonbohning]

+1 on copyright

[wiliamhuang]

you need to add the hpe copyright :-) the change is fine for me. it is concerning though that our test VMs are that different. at some point we should talk with DCO team to remove the old VMs from commission.

"Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP" was already added to this file last week.

[daltonbohning]

you need to add the hpe copyright :-) the change is fine for me. it is concerning though that our test VMs are that different. at some point we should talk with DCO team to remove the old VMs from commission.

"Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP" was already added to this file last week.

Ah, it's because you committed with an intel email instead of hpe

[wiliamhuang]

Ah, it's because you committed with an intel email instead of hpe

Thank you! I will start using HPE email in next PR.

[jolivier23]

Commit message title needs to follow format

[wiliamhuang]

Commit message title needs to follow format

Just updated the title. Thank you!

[wiliamhuang]

@daos-stack/daos-gatekeeper Shall we land this PR? Thank you!

[daltonbohning]

https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/actions/runs/12832307988/job/35784727316?pr=15739

Errors are Component should be lower-case

I updated so it stops complaining

[wiliamhuang]

https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/actions/runs/12832307988/job/35784727316?pr=15739

Errors are Component should be lower-case

I updated so it stops complaining

@daltonbohning Thank you very much! I requested the approval to backporting this to 2.6. Once it is approved, I will create a backport PR for 2.6.