Skip to content

DAOS-18127 container: use VERSION 1 for backward compatibility in con…#17018

Merged
mchaarawi merged 1 commit intorelease/2.6from
shilongw/DAOS-18127-release2.6
Oct 23, 2025
Merged

DAOS-18127 container: use VERSION 1 for backward compatibility in con…#17018
mchaarawi merged 1 commit intorelease/2.6from
shilongw/DAOS-18127-release2.6

Conversation

@wangshilong
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…tainer creation

New container creation by clients will specify the object version. If not specified (dpe_val == 0), it indicates a client from before DAOS 2.6.4, so use VERSION 1 for backward compatibility instead of inheriting from pool object version.

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

…tainer creation

New container creation by clients will specify the object version.
If not specified (dpe_val == 0), it indicates a client from before
DAOS 2.6.4, so use VERSION 1 for backward compatibility instead
of inheriting from pool object version.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <shilong.wang@hpe.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Ticket title is 'Cannot create/open a container with 2.6.4 server using 2.6.3 client'
Status is 'Open'
Labels: 'interop'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18127

@wangshilong wangshilong marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2025 01:40
@wangshilong wangshilong requested review from a team as code owners October 23, 2025 01:40
@mchaarawi mchaarawi merged commit 06acdf4 into release/2.6 Oct 23, 2025
41 of 42 checks passed
@mchaarawi mchaarawi deleted the shilongw/DAOS-18127-release2.6 branch October 23, 2025 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants