-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Remove use of package keyword #720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
contracts/schemes/UpgradeScheme.sol
Outdated
| address indexed _avatar, | ||
| bytes32 indexed _proposalId | ||
| bytes32 indexed _proposalId, | ||
| int256 _param |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this needed ?
should it be a boolean ?
should it be called _decision ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes things slightly easier in the subgraph and we have it in all other contracts like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should it be a boolean ?
should it be called _decision ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure, it's an int everywhere else, I think the voting machine returns int so that's why.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this are due to history reasons , we now have the chance to rewrite history :)
I think it should be boolean , name decision .
does subgraph look for this event ? why ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to mark the proposal as executed and in this case also update the contract info versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed
No description provided.