docs: slim README comparison table, add comprehensive book chapter#3312
Conversation
Reduce the README table to Ethereum, Solana, and Dash Platform for readability. Move the full comparison (8 chains, 25+ dimensions) to a dedicated Platform Comparison chapter in the book covering consensus, querying, smart contracts, token support, and project/ecosystem details. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change adds comprehensive platform comparison documentation as a new file and updates the README with an architecture deep-dive section and refined Platform comparison table focused on three platforms: Ethereum, Solana, and Dash Platform. A corresponding documentation link is added to the book summary. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…ison Add -/+/++/+++ ratings across all dimensions. New rows: throughput, smart contract security, ecosystem maturity. Rename privacy to "native token privacy" with account model distinction. Bitcoin gets + for UTXO rotation, account-model chains get - for full transparency. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tform Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rename to "Throughput (simple tx)" for fair comparison. Rating tiers: +++ for >10,000, ++ for 1,000-10,000, + for <1,000. Platform at ~1,000 tx/s for simple transactions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@book/src/platform-comparison.md`:
- Line 15: The throughput rating for Dash Platform in the table row containing
"| **Throughput (simple tx)** | `-` ~7 tx/s | `+` ~15-30 tx/s | `+++` ~65,000
tx/s | `+++` Scales per parachain | `+++` ~100,000 tx/s (sharded) | `+++`
Per-chain | `++` ~4,500 tx/s | `+` ~1,000 tx/s |" is inconsistent with the
documented tiers; update the Dash Platform cell from "`+` ~1,000 tx/s" to "`++`
~1,000 tx/s" so the symbol aligns with the 1,000–10,000 tx/s tier, keeping the
numeric value unchanged.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9af817dd-4127-43a6-9fd4-e183db24b4bc
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.mdbook/src/SUMMARY.mdbook/src/platform-comparison.md
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit