ci: allow thepastaclaw fork PRs to run on macOS runner

[QuantumExplorer]

Summary

• Allow PRs from thepastaclaw's fork to run on the self-hosted macOS ARM64 runner
• Currently fork PRs skip all Rust tests because the macOS job condition requires head.repo.full_name == github.repository

Context

thepastaclaw has 11 open PRs, none of which can run Rust tests because they're from a fork. The Ubuntu backup runners are also disabled (UBUNTU_BACKUP_ENABLED != true), so zero Rust test coverage runs for any fork PR.

Test plan

• Once merged, thepastaclaw's PRs will trigger macOS Rust tests on re-push

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated test workflow configuration to improve macOS testing scenarios for contributed pull requests.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 786c6ba8-c31d-4c86-b762-7c050f264239

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2c1039 and abe751f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/tests-rs-workspace.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single condition is added to the macOS test job guard in the GitHub Actions workflow file, enabling the user 'thepastaclaw' to trigger macOS Rust workspace tests on pull requests from forks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow .github/workflows/tests-rs-workspace.yml	Added conditional logic to macOS test job to permit triggering from fork PRs when the PR owner is 'thepastaclaw'.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐰 A carrot-colored condition takes root,
Letting 'thepastaclaw' forge ahead with boot,
macOS tests now jump at their command,
From forks far and wide across the land! 🌱

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch ci/allow-thepastaclaw-mac-runner

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.51%. Comparing base (b0c1667) to head (abe751f).
⚠️ Report is 12 commits behind head on v3.1-dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           v3.1-dev    #3318      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.05%   72.51%   +1.46%     
============================================
  Files          3293     3293              
  Lines        265909   268481    +2572     
============================================
+ Hits         188951   194702    +5751     
+ Misses        76958    73779    -3179     

Components	Coverage Δ
dpp	60.13% <ø> (ø)
drive	78.31% <ø> (+0.13%)	⬆️
drive-abci	83.91% <ø> (+0.42%)	⬆️
sdk	31.25% <ø> (ø)
dapi-client	79.06% <ø> (+39.98%)	⬆️
platform-version	∅ <ø> (∅)
platform-value	58.46% <ø> (+18.62%)	⬆️
platform-wallet	60.40% <ø> (ø)
drive-proof-verifier	∅ <ø> (∅)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.