Improve multi dataframe join performance#8740
Merged
Conversation
…ive merge function to take also operate on the initial frame rather than a seperate non-parallel merge. Fix
Collaborator
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
holdenk
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
cc @KrishanBhasin who was the last to work on |
Member
|
add to allowlist |
Member
|
Thanks for this change @holdenk and thanks @KrishanBhasin for the review! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
by allowing recursive merge function to take also operate on the initial frame rather than a separate non-parallel merge.
py.test dask --verbose -k test_multi.py)pre-commit run --all-files