Fix dashboard tests for Lakeview API behavior change#4640
Merged
Conversation
The server-side Lakeview API changed behavior in two ways:
1. `lakeview update` now returns the full `serialized_dashboard` in its
response, even when the update only changed other fields (e.g.
`display_name`). Previously it returned "{}".
2. `lakeview update` now clears fields not included in the request
(e.g. `warehouse_id`). Previously unspecified fields were preserved.
Both changes are consistent with a move from partial update (merge) to
full replace semantics on the Lakeview API's mutable fields.
Update acceptance tests, testserver, and integration test to match.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pietern
requested review from
andrewnester,
anton-107,
denik and
shreyas-goenka
as code owners
Collaborator
|
Commit: dfe4e88
29 interesting tests: 9 FAIL, 7 KNOWN, 7 SKIP, 5 flaky, 1 BUG
Top 36 slowest tests (at least 2 minutes):
|
andrewnester
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2026
The testserver's DashboardUpdate now clears warehouse_id when not provided in the update request, matching the new Lakeview API behavior. Update expected output accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
anton-107
reviewed
Mar 3, 2026
| if updateReq.WarehouseId != "" { | ||
| dashboard.WarehouseId = updateReq.WarehouseId | ||
| } | ||
| dashboard.WarehouseId = updateReq.WarehouseId |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update dashboard API is using the PATCH semantics (see https://docs.databricks.com/api/workspace/lakeview/update). If the field is missing from the request the previous values should be left intact.
The generate/dashboard-inplace was failing in the original commit because of this, but I could not find: which local test was failing prior to this change?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It doesn't have an update_mask field to select which fields to update though.
This testserver change aligns the local test with the remote observed behavior.
Collaborator
|
Commit: 3ef5948
69 interesting tests: 36 FAIL, 16 RECOVERED, 8 KNOWN, 4 flaky, 2 BUG, 2 MISS, 1 SKIP
Top 50 slowest tests (at least 2 minutes):
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
The server-side Lakeview API changed behavior in two ways:
lakeview updatenow returns the fullserialized_dashboardin its response, even when the update only changed other fields (e.g.display_name). Previously it returned "{}".lakeview updatenow clears fields not included in the request (e.g.warehouse_id). Previously unspecified fields were preserved.Both changes are consistent with a move from partial update (merge) to full replace semantics on the Lakeview API's mutable fields.
Tests
Update acceptance tests, testserver, and integration test to match.