Skip to content

Conversation

Synicix
Copy link
Contributor

@Synicix Synicix commented May 28, 2021

No description provided.

@Synicix Synicix linked an issue May 28, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@Synicix Synicix marked this pull request as draft May 28, 2021 06:54
@Synicix Synicix marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2021 07:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@guzman-raphael guzman-raphael left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Synicix Thanks man. Good work on this. The fix is straightforward here so good with that. Have feedback mainly related to test, style, and some typos.

We should also appropriately update the version and release log. Linking examples from another PR in how we usually do this in datajoint-matlab.

Also, the tests are failing b/c you pointed from your fork to master w/o going through a stage step first. I know there is another #369 already pointed to stage but I created a separate copy in stage2 to prevent collisions for you. You can safely point this PR there.

@Synicix Synicix changed the base branch from master to stage May 28, 2021 16:17
@Synicix Synicix changed the base branch from stage to stage2 May 28, 2021 16:18
@guzman-raphael guzman-raphael merged commit 9258406 into datajoint:stage2 May 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

{} is not supported in attribute comments

2 participants