(kernel-rolling) arch: Add basic platform support for Phytium #171
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add MAINTAINERS entry for Phytium SoC family with myself as the maintainer. Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: I6482fe67fc189aa5b89ad93f16be9dd39332ac02
This patch adds supoort for the Phytium SoC family. Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: Ibe06dc2e54a413a8c1257fef3aade99e6ca6480f
Add phytium to the list of DT vendor prefixes. Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: I3a7339f97405ebaaa4472704c7310ac7a37a79d1
Update pci_ids.h with the vendor ID for Phytium. Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: Ie0ea6afa71a8ba2f66f8426c1db063cd734d985c
Add initial device tree for Phytium Pe220x SoCs. Phytium Pe220x series has three specs (Pe2201/Pe2202/Pe2204), distinguished by the number of CPU core. Besides CPU cores, on-chip peripherals also vary. Thus, we split them into three separate DTBs. Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Song Wenting <songwenting@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhenhua <chenzhenhua@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yang Liu <yangliu2021@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Zhu Mingshuai <zhumingshuai@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Cheng Quan <chengquan@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Xu <wangxu@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yiqun <zhangyiqun@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yulin <zhouyulin1283@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jian <zhangjian1300@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Min <wangmin@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: I0e56b24c45675a05b248653255429c17498adb5f
Add support for Phytium Pe220x demo boards which covers all three variants of Pe220x SoC series. Signed-off-by: Chen Zhenhua <chenzhenhua@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Feng Jun <fengjun@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Lai Xueyu <laixueyu1280@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@phytium.com.cn> Change-Id: I2cb696deeed73e8471491cad1baaa7abf334c711
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @MingcongBai. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
commit b45f721775947a84996deb5c661602254ce25ce6 upstream. When loading guest XSAVE state via KVM_SET_XSAVE, and when updating XFD in response to a guest WRMSR, clear XFD-disabled features in the saved (or to be restored) XSTATE_BV to ensure KVM doesn't attempt to load state for features that are disabled via the guest's XFD. Because the kernel executes XRSTOR with the guest's XFD, saving XSTATE_BV[i]=1 with XFD[i]=1 will cause XRSTOR to #NM and panic the kernel. E.g. if fpu_update_guest_xfd() sets XFD without clearing XSTATE_BV: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#29: amx_test/848 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 29 UID: 1000 PID: 848 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-ffa07f7fd437-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm deepin-community#171 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: <TASK> asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 switch_fpu_return+0x4a/0xb0 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1245/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This can happen if the guest executes WRMSR(MSR_IA32_XFD) to set XFD[18] = 1, and a host IRQ triggers kernel_fpu_begin() prior to the vmexit handler's call to fpu_update_guest_xfd(). and if userspace stuffs XSTATE_BV[i]=1 via KVM_SET_XSAVE: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#14: amx_test/867 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 14 UID: 1000 PID: 867 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-2dace9faccd6-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm deepin-community#168 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: <TASK> asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x6b/0x120 kvm_load_guest_fpu+0x30/0x80 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x85/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The new behavior is consistent with the AMX architecture. Per Intel's SDM, XSAVE saves XSTATE_BV as '0' for components that are disabled via XFD (and non-compacted XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component): If XSAVE, XSAVEC, XSAVEOPT, or XSAVES is saving the state component i, the instruction does not generate #NM when XCR0[i] = IA32_XFD[i] = 1; instead, it operates as if XINUSE[i] = 0 (and the state component was in its initial state): it saves bit i of XSTATE_BV field of the XSAVE header as 0; in addition, XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component (the other instructions do not save state component i). Alternatively, KVM could always do XRSTOR with XFD=0, e.g. by using a constant XFD based on the set of enabled features when XSAVEing for a struct fpu_guest. However, having XSTATE_BV[i]=1 for XFD-disabled features can only happen in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, because fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate()'s call to save_fpregs_to_fpstate() saves the outgoing FPU state with the current XFD; and that is (on all but the first WRMSR to XFD) the guest XFD. Therefore, XFD can only go out of sync with XSTATE_BV in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, and it we can consider it (de facto) part of KVM ABI that KVM_GET_XSAVE returns XSTATE_BV[i]=0 for XFD-disabled features. Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 820a6ee ("kvm: x86: Add emulation for IA32_XFD", 2022-01-14) Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> [Move clearing of XSTATE_BV from fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate to kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave. - Paolo] Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit f577508cc8a0adb8b4ebe9480bba7683b6149930) Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
commit b45f721775947a84996deb5c661602254ce25ce6 upstream. When loading guest XSAVE state via KVM_SET_XSAVE, and when updating XFD in response to a guest WRMSR, clear XFD-disabled features in the saved (or to be restored) XSTATE_BV to ensure KVM doesn't attempt to load state for features that are disabled via the guest's XFD. Because the kernel executes XRSTOR with the guest's XFD, saving XSTATE_BV[i]=1 with XFD[i]=1 will cause XRSTOR to #NM and panic the kernel. E.g. if fpu_update_guest_xfd() sets XFD without clearing XSTATE_BV: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#29: amx_test/848 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 29 UID: 1000 PID: 848 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-ffa07f7fd437-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm deepin-community#171 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: <TASK> asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 switch_fpu_return+0x4a/0xb0 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1245/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This can happen if the guest executes WRMSR(MSR_IA32_XFD) to set XFD[18] = 1, and a host IRQ triggers kernel_fpu_begin() prior to the vmexit handler's call to fpu_update_guest_xfd(). and if userspace stuffs XSTATE_BV[i]=1 via KVM_SET_XSAVE: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#14: amx_test/867 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 14 UID: 1000 PID: 867 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-2dace9faccd6-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm deepin-community#168 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: <TASK> asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x6b/0x120 kvm_load_guest_fpu+0x30/0x80 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x85/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The new behavior is consistent with the AMX architecture. Per Intel's SDM, XSAVE saves XSTATE_BV as '0' for components that are disabled via XFD (and non-compacted XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component): If XSAVE, XSAVEC, XSAVEOPT, or XSAVES is saving the state component i, the instruction does not generate #NM when XCR0[i] = IA32_XFD[i] = 1; instead, it operates as if XINUSE[i] = 0 (and the state component was in its initial state): it saves bit i of XSTATE_BV field of the XSAVE header as 0; in addition, XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component (the other instructions do not save state component i). Alternatively, KVM could always do XRSTOR with XFD=0, e.g. by using a constant XFD based on the set of enabled features when XSAVEing for a struct fpu_guest. However, having XSTATE_BV[i]=1 for XFD-disabled features can only happen in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, because fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate()'s call to save_fpregs_to_fpstate() saves the outgoing FPU state with the current XFD; and that is (on all but the first WRMSR to XFD) the guest XFD. Therefore, XFD can only go out of sync with XSTATE_BV in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, and it we can consider it (de facto) part of KVM ABI that KVM_GET_XSAVE returns XSTATE_BV[i]=0 for XFD-disabled features. Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 820a6ee ("kvm: x86: Add emulation for IA32_XFD", 2022-01-14) Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> [Move clearing of XSTATE_BV from fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate to kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave. - Paolo] Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit f577508cc8a0adb8b4ebe9480bba7683b6149930) Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Picked and rebased from #107.
From original pull request: