Remove andyjakubowski from CODEOWNERS

[jamesbhobbs]

Remove andyjakubowski from CODEOWNERS

Summary

Removed @andyjakubowski from the default code owners list in the jupyterlab-deepnote repository. This user will no longer be automatically requested for code reviews on pull requests.

This change is part of a broader update to remove this user from code ownership across multiple Deepnote repositories (jupyterlab-deepnote, deepnote, vscode-deepnote, and deepnote-internal).

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

• Verify that removing @andyjakubowski from code ownership is authorized and aligns with team/organizational changes
• Check if there are any active PRs where this user is currently assigned as a reviewer
• Confirm that the remaining code owners (@saltenasl, @jamesbhobbs, @Artmann) provide adequate coverage for this repository

Notes

• This is a configuration-only change with no code modifications
• The change takes effect immediately once merged - future PRs will not request reviews from this user
• Part of a coordinated update across multiple repositories

---

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/5a8f5921776546b797c99b41edeb78bb
Requested by: James Hobbs (james@deepnote.com) / @jamesbhobbs

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated code ownership configuration to reflect current team structure.

[devin-ai-integration]

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

• Address comments on this PR that start with 'DevinAI' or '@devin'.
• Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

• Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .github/CODEOWNERS file was updated to remove @andyjakubowski from the default code owners. The remaining owners (@saltenasl, @jamesbhobbs, and @Artmann) stay in place. This is a metadata-only change affecting ownership routing for GitHub pull request review assignments.

Possibly related PRs

• deepnote/deepnote-internal#18397: Modifies CODEOWNERS entries with specific adjustments to andyjakubowski's ownership scope across libraries.
• chore(codeowners): update repository ownership deepnote#26: Directly modifies the same CODEOWNERS line, removing @andyjakubowski from the default ownership.
• chore: add CODEOWNERS file vscode-deepnote#31: Changes CODEOWNERS list entries, including removal of @andyjakubowski from ownership assignments.

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "Remove andyjakubowski from CODEOWNERS" directly and accurately describes the primary change: the removal of andyjakubowski from the CODEOWNERS file. It is specific, concise, and clearly communicates what was changed without vagueness or extraneous details. The title aligns precisely with the changeset content and PR objectives.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90cbb23 and ded5a4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: License Check
• GitHub Check: Audit - All
• GitHub Check: Audit - Production
• GitHub Check: Lint & Format
• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: check_release

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

2-2: CODEOWNERS syntax valid; 3 active reviews found with @andyjakubowski.

Change is safe—removes only future auto-assignments. Existing reviews on PR #37, #33, #26 remain active; update manually if needed.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.20%. Comparing base (90cbb23) to head (ded5a4e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #38   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.20%   50.20%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         249      249           
  Branches       26       26           
=======================================
  Hits          125      125           
  Misses        119      119           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.