Skip to content

Conversation

@jamesbhobbs
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesbhobbs jamesbhobbs commented Oct 9, 2025

chore: add CODEOWNERS file

Summary

Adds a .github/CODEOWNERS file to automatically suggest reviewers for pull requests. The file designates @saltenasl @jamesbhobbs @Artmann @andyjakubowski as default owners for all files in the repository, copied from the configuration in deepnote/deepnote.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

  • Verify that all GitHub usernames (@saltenasl @jamesbhobbs @Artmann @andyjakubowski) are correct and active
  • Confirm these individuals are appropriate code owners for this VS Code extension repository

Notes

  • This configuration mirrors the CODEOWNERS setup from the main deepnote/deepnote repository
  • GitHub will automatically suggest these users as reviewers on future PRs
  • The * pattern applies the ownership to all files in the repository

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/7df2a76e10f2447faf46c3c41fd5cc8c
Requested by: James Hobbs (@jamesbhobbs)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Established repository-wide code ownership configuration to automatically assign appropriate reviewers on pull requests.
    • Improves accountability, clarifies ownership, and streamlines the review process across the project.
    • Enhances contributor workflow by ensuring consistent review coverage and faster routing of changes.
    • No impact to user-facing functionality or public APIs.

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR that start with 'DevinAI' or '@devin'.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a repository-wide CODEOWNERS rule in .github/CODEOWNERS. The entry sets default owners for all files (*) to: saltenasl, jamesbhobbs, Artmann, and andyjakubowski. No source code or public API changes.

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title uses a clear “chore:” prefix and concisely states the primary change of adding the CODEOWNERS file, matching the PR’s content and intent.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45fb503 and 2c6226f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: m1so
PR: deepnote/app-config#1310
File: .github/CODEOWNERS:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T14:44:52.932Z
Learning: GitHub natively validates CODEOWNERS files for syntax errors and invalid team references, making external validation actions potentially unnecessary for small CODEOWNERS files where human validation is still feasible.
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T14:44:52.932Z
Learnt from: m1so
PR: deepnote/app-config#1310
File: .github/CODEOWNERS:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T14:44:52.932Z
Learning: GitHub natively validates CODEOWNERS files for syntax errors and invalid team references, making external validation actions potentially unnecessary for small CODEOWNERS files where human validation is still feasible.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T14:45:50.365Z
Learnt from: m1so
PR: deepnote/app-config#1310
File: .github/CODEOWNERS:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T14:45:50.365Z
Learning: In CODEOWNERS files, m1so prefers specific paths over glob patterns when assigning broad ownership groups to avoid unintentionally granting access to other helm charts or configurations that shouldn't be accessible to the same group.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: check_release
  • GitHub Check: build

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jamesbhobbs jamesbhobbs marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2025 16:22
@andyjakubowski andyjakubowski self-requested a review October 10, 2025 09:28
@jamesbhobbs jamesbhobbs merged commit 544b0c8 into main Oct 10, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants