Replies: 1 comment
|
Two things are fused in one call here, and only one of them is the one you asked for.
So a lane cannot put this session on that model without also re-pointing every later session in the same DSH home — and, as your second case shows, the headless lane has no surface to carry a model at all: Two details the report does not state, both of which make a fix cheaper:
The capability already exists in-tree for exactly one lane. What I shipped
Two surfaces, one per missing lane:
- set:
- id: session-model
config: { provider: deepseek, model: deepseek-chat, reasoningEffort: high }A pin that changes the route without naming an effort clears the inherited effort — the effort belonged to the route that carried it, the same rule the harness's own selection uses — and every other resolved field ( Evidence: 42 tests against a real cordis context (real service injection, real waterfall dispatch, real Honest boundary: this supplies a path that never writes the deployment default; it cannot stop the path that does. The session model picker still calls Sibling assets on the same seam: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
--modelcannot avoid moving the deployment default (W-025). Release to the lane with the install-hazards report.Target: DSH Discussion (Ideas)
All reactions