Skip to content

UT Coverage#86

Merged
satyakonduri merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
UT_Coverage_new
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

UT Coverage#86
satyakonduri merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
UT_Coverage_new

Conversation

@satyakonduri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Increasing Unit test code coverage

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
https://github.com/dell/csm/issues/1707

Results when ran unit tests locally:
image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

@satyakonduri satyakonduri merged commit 47afb5b into main Mar 3, 2025
@satyakonduri satyakonduri deleted the UT_Coverage_new branch March 3, 2025 05:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants