Trouble while migrating to latest version

[hoanhxlyn]

Heya, like the title suggest i am having some issues when updating to the latest version. Specifically this

    andrew-laptop = {
      includes = [
        (den.batteries.import-tree ../../hosts)
      ];
      provides.to-users.includes = [
        <workstation>
        <my/terminals/alacritty>
        <core.power-manager>
      ];
    };
    andrew-pc = {
      includes = [
        (den.batteries.import-tree ../../hosts)
      ];
      provides.to-users.includes = [
        <workstation>
        <core.nvidia>
        <my/terminals/alacritty>
        <my/gaming/waydroid>
      ];
    };

when i tried to run just test it prints error complaining about

Failed assertions:        - The ‘fileSystems’ option does not specify your root file system.

While my previous config works just fine

{
  den,
  __findFile,
  ...
}: {
  den.aspects = {
    workstation.includes = [
      (den._.import-tree._.host ../../hosts)
      <core.bootable>
      # bunch of stuff
    ];
    andrew-laptop.provides.to-users.includes = [
      <workstation>
      <my/terminals/alacritty>
      <core.power-manager>
    ];
    andrew-pc.provides.to-users.includes = [
      <workstation>
      <core.nvidia>
      <my/terminals/alacritty>
      <my/gaming/waydroid>
    ];
  };
}

I will honest i am still a newbie with nixos and i'd appreciate any help including recommendation on how should i organize aspects 🙏🙏🙏

[sini]

I assume this is your nix configuration? https://github.com/hoanhxlyn/andrewix I'm happy to help. Taking a look.

[sini]

@hoanhxlyn can you push a branch with your partial migration? I can try and open a PR with a config fix if I identify an error in your flake, or if I find a regression in den is the root cause (which it very well may be) I'll of course fix it upstream. :)

[hoanhxlyn]

@sini Thank you very much, i will push a branch once i have some free time 🔥

[sini]

#512 Let me know if this fixes your issue. :)

[hoanhxlyn]

Hi @sini, sorry for the wait
i have just checked it again and the PR seems to fixed the regression errors but now it prints new one

┏━ 1 Errors: 
 ⋮ 
┃        … while evaluating the attribute 'value'
┃          at «https://releases.nixos.org/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-26.05pre995785.c6e5ca3c836a/nixexprs.tar.xz?narHash=sha256-UuHF8sb6WETWb7HPfOvOVXTAl7UX…
┃          1166|     // {
┃          1167|       value = addErrorContext "while evaluating the option `${showOption loc}':" value;
┃              |       ^
┃          1168|       inherit (res.defsFinal') highestPrio;
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `system.build.toplevel':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/n2bp2pkhdhgdql7p9a2jyr0p993w7bqg-source/nixos/modules/system/activation/top-level.nix':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `warnings':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/n2bp2pkhdhgdql7p9a2jyr0p993w7bqg-source/nixos/modules/system/boot/systemd.nix':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `systemd.services.mandb.serviceConfig':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/n2bp2pkhdhgdql7p9a2jyr0p993w7bqg-source/nixos/modules/system/boot/systemd.nix':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `systemd.services.mandb.script':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/n2bp2pkhdhgdql7p9a2jyr0p993w7bqg-source/nixos/modules/misc/man-db.nix':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `documentation.man.man-db.manualPages':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `environment.systemPackages':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/n2bp2pkhdhgdql7p9a2jyr0p993w7bqg-source/nixos/modules/i18n/input-method/default.nix':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `i18n.inputMethod.package':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating the option `i18n.inputMethod.fcitx5.addons':
┃ 
┃        … while evaluating definitions from `nixos@core/i18n':
┃ 
┃        (stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full, detailed trace)
┃ 
┃        error: evaluation aborted with the following error message: 'lib.customisation.callPackageWith: Function called without required argumen…
┣━━━                                                            
┗━ ∑ ⚠ Exited with 1 errors reported by nix at 08:15:37 after 7s
Error: 
   0: Failed to build configuration
   1: Command exited with status ExitStatus(Exited(1))

I have push a new branch refactor/migrate to my repo dotfiles. Could you take a quick look 🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️

[sini]

Thanks for pushing it. I'll look at it first thing tomorrow morning so in around ~12 hours. Thank you for your patience and report. :)

[sini]

I had my agent take a quick look at your error message and it has this to say:

Not a den issue. extra-cmake-modules was removed from nixpkgs top-level and moved to kdePackages.extra-cmake-modules. The fcitx5-vmk-nix flake uses pkgs.callPackage ./default.nix {} which can no longer resolve extra-cmake-modules from nixpkgs scope.

The user needs to either:

1. Pin their nixpkgs to a version that still has extra-cmake-modules at the top level
2. Report the issue to hoanhxlyn/fcitx5-vmk-nix — their default.nix needs to source extra-cmake-modules from kdePackages
3. Use an overlay to alias extra-cmake-modules = pkgs.kdePackages.extra-cmake-modules

This is confirmed by nix eval andrewix.inputs.fcitx5-vmk-nix.packages.x86_64-linux.fcitx5-vmk.name failing identically without den in the picture at all.

Can you verify if that's the case or if you have any reason to think den is still in the loop?

[hoanhxlyn]

Oh!
So i believe my initial error has been fixed and we can happily closed this