Add problem matchers for deno lint#62
Conversation
| "owner": "deno-lint", | ||
| "pattern": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "regexp": "^(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*(warning|warn|error)(?:\\[(\\S*)\\])?(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*: (.*?)(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*$", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(warning|warn|error)
I know that there is at least an error in the severity of deno lint, but I am not exactly sure what other severities exist. If anyone has exact information, please let me know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't have a clue of what to do with any of this I'm stuck all the way around if anyone can help me to try and configure this please let me knw thank you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe add deno- as prefix to this file (deno-problem-matchers.json), to make it more consistent with examples from actions/toolkit?
3c4b587 to
b6cd600
Compare
6ec544a to
83b8948
Compare
|
Hmmm, it seems to have stopped working properly now. Perhaps the output format of edit: It seems that the output of I experimented with the modified version and it worked well, so it probably should not be a problem now. |
83b8948 to
fe699ef
Compare
fe699ef to
a2690b9
Compare
crowlKats
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, sorry for the delay on this. Will cut a release of setup-deno during the day

Related to:
I did not add a matcher for
deno fmt --checkthis time, because I thought its output lacked tinformation to be used by problem matchers and could not be handled well.I have tried this feature on my own sample project and confirmed that it works well like this:
The real example is here: