feat: replay phase preset runtime gates#204
Conversation
|
@kapi-agent review Revision explanation for current head What changed
Why this closes the prior feedback
Verification
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
kapi-agent review
Verdict: APPROVE
Final approval summary
Review journey
This PR adds runtime replay support for PhasePreset events and RunState-backed gate evaluation. The semantic scope is small and cohesive: one domain module plus matching tests for replayed evidence/artifact state and gate fixture coverage. There was no prior kapi-agent blocking review on this head.
What changed
src/domain/phase-preset.ts- Adds
PhasePresetRuntimeEvent,PhasePresetRunState, and replay/evaluation helpers. - Adds exported gate fixtures covering pass, block, repair, human decision, and abort paths.
- Adds
test/phase-preset.test.ts- Adds fixture coverage assertions.
- Adds RunState replay test proving replayed artifacts/evidence feed the existing fail-closed gate evaluator.
Why this is correct
The new RunState gate path delegates to the existing evaluatePhasePresetGate implementation rather than duplicating gate logic, so existing fail-closed behavior and validation remain centralized. Replay copies gate-evaluation reasons and uses sets for evidence/artifacts/branches, avoiding duplicate availability entries while preserving gate-evaluation history order.
Evidence
- Verifier gate: PASS —
npm ci && npm run verifyexited 0. - Size gate: PASS — 84 changed lines, below the 200-line semantic review threshold.
- Revision-explanation status: not required; found.
- Ilchul review harness gate: PASS — neutral/comment result with 0 blocking findings.
- Inspected files:
src/domain/phase-preset.ts,test/phase-preset.test.ts.
Remaining risks and approval rationale
Remaining risk is low: replay currently assumes typed in-process events rather than validating unknown external event payloads. That is acceptable for this bounded domain addition because gate enforcement still flows through the existing evaluator and tests cover the intended contract. Approval is justified because all configured gates pass and no blocking correctness, safety, workflow-contract, or regression issue remains.
Blocking issues
None.
Warnings / risks
src/domain/phase-preset.ts:replayPhasePresetRunStateis typed but not runtime-validating arbitrary malformed events. If these events later come directly from untrusted persisted JSON, add a parser/validator before replay.
Suggestions
- Consider adding a future negative test for duplicate replay events if duplicate suppression is an intentional contract rather than an implementation detail.
Looks good
- Reuses
evaluatePhasePresetGatefor RunState-backed evaluation instead of creating a parallel gate evaluator. - Tests cover both fixture paths and the replay-to-gate path.
- Gate fixtures include human-decision and abort paths, which helps preserve workflow contract integrity.
Verification notes
Verifier gate status: PASS. Size gate status: PASS. Revision-explanation status: not required; found. CI/local evidence provided: npm ci && npm run verify passed, including tests, checks, unused checks, and quality budgets.
Engine: pi
Summary
Test Plan
npx tsx --test test/phase-preset.test.tsnpm run check:unusednpm run quality:budgetsgit diff --checknpm run verifyCloses #198