refactor: rename presentation workflow helpers#222
Conversation
|
@kapi-agent review Head SHA: d80ae9c What changed:
Why this closes prior feedback:
Verification:
Residual scan: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
kapi-agent review
Verdict: APPROVE
Final approval summary
Review journey
This PR’s original goal is a narrow refactor: rename presentation-layer helper symbols away from product-specific Kapi* / kapi* implementation names while preserving public kapi_* tools, /kapi-* slash commands, widget keys, and serialized compatibility contracts. The semantic scope is bounded to internal presentation registration/UI helper naming plus the audit documentation. There was no prior kapi-agent review on this head, so no fix ping-pong was required.
What changed
Key internal names were updated across:
index.tssrc/presentation/pi-extension.tssrc/presentation/extension-registration.tssrc/presentation/tools.tssrc/presentation/tool-core-types.tssrc/presentation/ui.tssrc/presentation/ui-resources.tssrc/presentation/command-ui-actions.tstest/presentation-ui.test.tsdocs/product-name-audit.md
The external contracts remain intentionally unchanged: kapi_* tool names, /kapi-* commands, "kapi" UI status/widget keys, and Kapi-facing user messages.
Why this is correct
The change is mechanically consistent with the audit goal and does not alter runtime behavior. Internal imports/exports were renamed together, tests were updated to reference the semantic helper names, and the PR preserves compatibility surfaces that should not be renamed without migration.
Evidence
Verifier gate: PASS. Size gate: PASS, 93 changed lines under the 200-line semantic review threshold. Revision-explanation status: not required and found. The configured verification ran successfully with npm ci && npm run verify, including tests, type/check gates, unused checks, and quality budgets. The Ilchul structured review harness passed with no blocking findings. I also inspected the changed presentation files and searched for stale renamed helper references.
Remaining risks and approval rationale
Remaining risk is low and limited to whether any external extension loader depends on the default export function’s runtime name in index.ts; that would be unusual, and the module still exports the same default function shape. Given passing verification, consistent internal renames, preserved public contracts, and updated audit documentation, approval is justified.
Blocking issues
None.
Warnings / risks
index.ts: the default export function was renamed fromkapitoextension. This should be safe for normal default-export loading, but if any out-of-band tooling introspects function names, that would be a minor compatibility risk.
Suggestions
- Consider adding a small smoke/assertion test for the extension entrypoint default export shape if the Pi extension loader contract is sensitive to entrypoint behavior.
Looks good
- Public contracts were preserved while internal helper names were made semantic.
- The rename is consistent across imports, exports, tests, and audit documentation.
- The residual scan described in the PR body matches the intended boundary between compatibility/product surfaces and reusable implementation names.
Verification notes
Verifier gate status: PASS — npm ci && npm run verify exited 0.
Size gate status: PASS — 93 changed lines, below threshold.
Revision-explanation status: not required; explanation present in the PR body.
Ilchul harness gate: PASS — neutral/comment result with zero blocking findings.
Engine: pi
Summary
Kapi*/kapi*implementation nameskapi_*agent tools,/kapi-*slash commands, widget keys, and compatibility contracts unchangedRefs #209
Verification
npm testnpm run checknpm run check:unusednpm run quality:budgetsResidual scan