Change minor version to reflect a breaking change[DHIS2-19426] #85
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Such changes really should be discussed before starting to put effort into them.
While strong typing is generally a good thing in this case I think the flexibility and simplicity of String is beneficial and I see no reason or need to make it more complicated.
In addition, as you say, this would be a SPI breaking change. Why would we break something that as far as I can tell is capable of doing what is needed.
Being an SPI this is part of the interfacing with other languages so every complication on the type level makes it harder to use/integrate for a caller.
So I am pretty sure we want to stick to String keys.
|
zubaira
changed the title
zubaira
changed the title
No description provided.