Skip to content

Conversation

@johnksv
Copy link
Contributor

@johnksv johnksv commented Jun 23, 2021

As it could cause problems when pojos from same xsds were on class path

Prefix all package names of generated pojos with no.digipost

@johnksv johnksv force-pushed the move-package-for-generated-pojo branch 6 times, most recently from 869e3a6 to dbdfaae Compare June 23, 2021 08:25
Copy link
Contributor

@post-svejk post-svejk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ser greit ut. Bør la @eivinhb og/eller @velfundert ta en kikk, og ta stilling til om denne endringen er ok i offentlig repo og som Maven-artefakter. Alternativet er vel å holde det på en privat fork, som kun deployer til vårt interne Maven-repo.

@post-svejk post-svejk requested review from eivinhb and velfundert June 23, 2021 08:59
@eivinhb
Copy link
Member

eivinhb commented Jun 23, 2021

It should be easy to test if this has backwards compatibility issues with the client and/or meldingsformidler. If that seems ok, then I see no issues here.

@johnksv
Copy link
Contributor Author

johnksv commented Aug 19, 2021

Must bump a major version due to change in package names. Thus clients and MF must change imports to be compatible with the changes introduced in this PR.

@johnksv johnksv force-pushed the move-package-for-generated-pojo branch from dbdfaae to 6165673 Compare September 1, 2021 12:41
…s when other pojos from same xsds were on class path
@johnksv johnksv force-pushed the move-package-for-generated-pojo branch from 6165673 to 5016d0c Compare September 1, 2021 12:46
@johnksv johnksv requested a review from runeflobakk September 1, 2021 13:28
Copy link
Member

@runeflobakk runeflobakk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Røddig! 🏆 🥇

@johnksv johnksv merged commit 0e3cea1 into main Sep 1, 2021
@johnksv johnksv deleted the move-package-for-generated-pojo branch September 1, 2021 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants