Update The CommCare Coding Style XML File

[conroy-ricketts]

Technical Summary

This PR is not linked to a ticket nor does it have any user facing changes. This is a simple fix for the issue we ran into here

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single configuration file for Android Studio code style settings has been updated to add a new import layout rule for the "androidx" package. The change inserts a package element with attributes withSubpackages="true" and static="false" into the IMPORT_LAYOUT_TABLE section, positioned immediately after the existing "android" entry, with appropriate empty line spacing preserved. This extends the IDE's import organization rules to handle AndroidX packages.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single configuration file with straightforward addition
• No logic changes or behavioral modifications
• Simple element insertion in XML configuration

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description is largely incomplete and does not adequately follow the provided template. While a Technical Summary section is present with a link to the related discussion, critical sections are entirely missing: Product Description (even though the author states there are no user-facing changes, this should be explicitly addressed), Feature Flag, Safety Assurance (including safety story, automated test coverage, and QA plan), and the Labels and Review checklist. Only one of the required sections is partially filled out, leaving the vast majority of the template unaddressed.	Complete the PR description by addressing the missing sections from the template. For the Product Description section, explicitly state that there are no user-facing changes as intended. For Safety Assurance, provide a brief safety story explaining why this configuration change is safe, confirm automated test coverage status, and outline the QA plan. Finally, complete the Labels and Review checklist to confirm that labels and reviewers are appropriately set for this change.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "Update The CommCare Coding Style XML File" is partially related to the changeset. It correctly identifies that the CommCare Coding Style XML file is being modified, which is accurate. However, the title lacks specificity about the substantive change—the addition of the androidx package to the import layout rules. While the word "Update" is somewhat generic, the title is not vague to the point of being meaningless (like "misc updates"), and it does convey which file is being changed, allowing a teammate to partially understand the nature of the change.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch update-commcare-coding-style

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50bf05b and 0e8b8ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .android_studio_settings/codestyles/CommCare Coding Style.xml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.android_studio_settings/codestyles/CommCare Coding Style.xml (1)

12-13: Well-placed addition to the import layout configuration.

The androidx package entry is correctly inserted immediately after the android entry with identical attributes and consistent formatting. This extension of the IDE's import organization rules to include AndroidX is a logical and properly implemented change.

Please confirm that this placement of androidx (immediately after android) resolves the issue referenced in PR #3385.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}