-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
Containerized PCP Integration #1986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Containerized PCP Integration #1986
Conversation
|
Replaces and updated PR #1759. |
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coming along nicely.
6471600 to
f23f0a1
Compare
|
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 957109c into 4b4a721 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
|
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 853d7e9 into dcb6ed2 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First pass review, more to come. Can you squash the set of commits down a bit? 22 seems to be more than we need to review. =)
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still reviewing ...
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like you also need to remove agent/tool-scripts/postprocess/pcp-postprocess.
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few more comments, and it looks like you need to "lint" the code changes.
2ded23a to
33761df
Compare
|
Fully tested with local+remote nodes |
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you squash down to one commit?
|
All in one now |
|
And yet ... needs a rebase. |
portante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Maxusmusti, one more rebase and we can merge.
Now working with local and remote hosts!
Unrelated to PR: