Skip to content

Conversation

@OndraMichal
Copy link
Contributor

Added emuns for Action Category and Design Situation.
Until this bug is fixed, those 2 are language dependent, which prevents their usage in other then English language.
This also applies to sections.
This is to be tested on branch BUGFIX-22810...
This will be merged right after this bug makes its way to GM.
Unit tests: 122 passed, 9 skipped in 155.48s

Until this bug is fixed, those 2 are language dependent, which prevents their usage in other then English language. This also applies to sections.
…bug_22810

unit tests: 124 passed, 9 skipped in 156.66s
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 327 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Large
Size       : +190 -137
Percentile : 72.7%

Total files changed: 9

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +11 -10
.py : +178 -126
pylintrc : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@OndraMichal
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR needs to be merged because it adjusts Client for changes in bug 22810, which has been merged to GM today.

@OndraMichal OndraMichal merged commit a017acd into main Apr 1, 2022
@OndraMichal OndraMichal deleted the OndrejMichal_bug_22810 branch April 1, 2022 04:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants