-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
OndrejMichal: Printout Report #193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
unit tests: 161 passed, 6 skipped in 260.99s (0:04:20)
|
Review:
|
|
|
||
| def closeModel(index_or_name, save_changes = False): | ||
| """ | ||
| ''' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One minor comment;
To be able to use openModel function, we do not have to create a session with Model() class. On the other hand to use the closeModel function first we need create the access with Model(False, modelName).
It'd be great if we mention it in the docStrings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed
|
This PR has Quantification details
Why proper sizing of changes matters
Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
What can I do to optimize my changes
How to interpret the change counts in git diff output
Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email) |
Description
Added Printout Report functions together with test. Since the test requires opening file the Model and associated functions (openModel, closeModel, delete) need to be updated without impact on current code.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Configuration:
Checklist: