Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
Yes, they are comparable. The differences come from floating point errors and data splits (histogram bin construction/quantile sketching). The underlying algorithm is the same regardless of the environment. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi team,
I currently am trying to use XGBoost for training certain models in a distributed manner (Dask based) using GPUs.
As per my understanding achieving identical models is possible only by restricting usage to an identical GPU config, setting seeds etc.
I wanted to understand from a HPT perspective- would the optimal model achieved via Hyperparameter Tuning on 2 different GPU configurations atleast be comparable to a certain extent - (ignoring edge cases where HPT gets stuck in a particular local maxima etc.) ?
Or does cluster configuration need to be factored in at some level which complicates things
All reactions