Skip to content

Conversation

@tianon
Copy link
Member

@tianon tianon commented Oct 11, 2016

cc @dmp42 @samalba -- any objections to deprecating the hipache official image?

We don't plan to remove the artifacts (in case folks are still using them), but it does seem prudent to let our users know the status of the project.

If there aren't objections to the deprecation, then I'd appreciate suggestions for improvement on the wording of the deprecation notice, especially whether the "potentially similar solutions" list is even in the right ballpark. 😇 ❤️

@samalba
Copy link

samalba commented Oct 11, 2016

I don't have any objection. For the deprecation notice, let's just be transparent and mention the development of the project stopped. I can update the README of the main project as well.

For alternatives, I guess vulcand is the closest one.

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Oct 11, 2016

Nice, updated the PR to list vulcand first (specifically, the mailgun/vulcand image since that appears to be maintained by upstream).

I think a note in the upstream hipache README would be a nice touch. 👍

@yosifkit yosifkit merged commit 64bbea0 into docker-library:master Oct 11, 2016
@yosifkit yosifkit deleted the hipache branch October 11, 2016 19:13
@jpetazzo
Copy link

Note: we could also mention traefik since it is similar to vulcand (and more actively maintained).

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Oct 11, 2016

@jpetazzo indeed, as-is it lists traefik after vulcand 😄 👍

tianon added a commit to docker-library/official-images that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
tianon added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants