skip installing rpmlint on RHEL8, 9

[thaJeztah]

• relates to pkg/model: remove cmd/cli/ tag prefix after go.mod consolidation #368 (comment)

in upstream CI, we don't use a licensed RHEL, but the UBI image, which doesn't come with the dependencies required by rpmlint;

Red Hat Universal Base Image 9 (RPMs) - CodeRea 3.8 MB/s | 288 kB     00:00
Error:
 Problem: package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.34)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libm.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package groff-base-1.22.4-10.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.29)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package glibc-2.34-231.el9_7.2.x86_64 from @System requires (glibc-gconv-extra(x86-64) = 2.34-231.el9_7.2 if redhat-rpm-config), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package glibc-2.34-231.el9_7.2.x86_64 from ubi-9-baseos-rpms requires (glibc-gconv-extra(x86-64) = 2.34-231.el9_7.2 if redhat-rpm-config), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmlint-1.11-19.el9.noarch from ubi-9-appstream-rpms requires /usr/bin/groff, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmlint-1.11-19.el9.noarch from ubi-9-appstream-rpms requires /usr/bin/gtbl, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpm-build-4.16.1.3-39.el9.x86_64 from ubi-9-appstream-rpms requires system-rpm-config, but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests

[thaJeztah]

Fedora 44 failures now with tini 😞

There was a PR for this (but I don't think it's in a release);

• chore: allow CMake though to 3.10 krallin/tini#233

ISTR we had this issue before, but worked around it

#35 25.93 + install_tini
#35 25.93 + echo 'Install tini version v0.19.0'
#35 25.93 Install tini version v0.19.0
#35 25.93 + git clone https://github.com/krallin/tini.git /go/tini
#35 25.93 Cloning into '/go/tini'...
#35 26.41 + cd /go/tini
#35 26.41 + git checkout -q v0.19.0
#35 26.42 + cmake .
#35 26.43 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required):
#35 26.43   Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.
#35 26.43 
#35 26.43   Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax
#35 26.43   to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated
#35 26.43   to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.
#35 26.43 
#35 26.43   Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.

[thaJeztah]

cc @crazy-max @vvoland - looks like the Fedora 44 builds are currently broken, so we may need to find a workaround for that.

[thaJeztah]

Opened moby/moby#52055 to fix the Fedora 44 build.