Skip to content

Added table-specific settings to ProtoTableElementProperties#55

Merged
lukasbash merged 1 commit intomainfrom
gg/add_table_only_settings
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

Added table-specific settings to ProtoTableElementProperties#55
lukasbash merged 1 commit intomainfrom
gg/add_table_only_settings

Conversation

@gerhardgruber
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR extends the ProtoTableElementProperties message by adding three new table-specific configuration options: horizontal offset (xOffset), left measure mode (leftMeasure), and header repetition (repeatHeader). Each new property follows the existing inheritance pattern with dedicated inheritance, value, and code fields.

Changes:

  • Added three new property groups to ProtoTableElementProperties: xOffset, leftMeasure, and repeatHeader
  • Updated package version from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3
  • Regenerated protocol buffer bindings for Go, JavaScript, and C#

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/DocumentElements/documentelements.table.proto Added three new property groups (xOffset, leftMeasure, repeatHeader) to ProtoTableElementProperties message
package.json Bumped version from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3
docframepb/docframe.pb.go Regenerated Go bindings with updated protoc-gen-go version and new fields
build/docframe.proto Added same three property groups as source proto file
build/Docframe.js Regenerated JavaScript bindings with new fields
build/Docframe.cs Regenerated C# bindings with new fields

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@lukasbash lukasbash merged commit 35c46c5 into main Jan 21, 2026
2 checks passed
@lukasbash lukasbash deleted the gg/add_table_only_settings branch January 21, 2026 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants