Official Support for Inertia.js integration #67043
Unanswered
GorgonSlayer
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
|
I think official support could be valuable, especially for developers who prefer server-side frameworks while still using modern frontend libraries. One possible approach would be to provide an optional integration package rather than making it part of the core ASP.NET Core framework. That would allow developers to choose between Blazor, Razor Pages, MVC, or an Inertia.js-based architecture without increasing the complexity of the default templates. From an architectural perspective, the main considerations would likely be:
Even if official support isn't planned, guidance or sample projects demonstrating best practices for integrating Inertia.js with ASP.NET Core could still provide significant value to the community. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Are there any plans at present to provide official integration and support with inertia.js?
I've been very impressed by the seamless way that you can bundle frontend code with Laravel, with Inertia.js extending this support to Elixir+Phoenix, Ruby on Rails and Django. While it does 'compete' with Blazor to some extent, it seems to fill a different use case. Are there any architectural or structural reasons which may block this as well?
All reactions