-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Add doc for updating Major Version & TFM #37020
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Fixes #35506 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a great doc to add. I've added some questions that might be helpful to answer in the doc inline.
Also, can you add a link to this file in docs/README.md?
docs/UpdatingMajorVersionAndTFM.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Updating Major Version | ||
|
|
||
| Typically, we will update the Major Version before updating the TFM. This is because updating Major Version only requires a logical agreement that `main` is no longer the place for work on the previous major release, while updating the TFM requires waiting for dotnet/runtime to update their TFM so that we can ingest that change. For an example, [this](https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/pull/35402) is the PR where we updated our branding from 6.0.0 to 7.0.0. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some questions to help me understand this a little bit more:
-
I assume because of the TFM updates requirement on dotnet/runtime, TFM updates can only happen in a dependency update PR. AKA it's part of the process of ingesting an update that goes from 6.x.x to 7.x.x.
-
What does the
Major Versionimpact? Is that just what gets set in local dev builds as the package version? So7.0.0-devor6.0.0-dev.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, in a dependency update PR. MajorVersion just updates the branding of the assets we produce in all builds, local & official
| 4. Change `PreReleaseBrandingLabel` to `Alpha $(PreReleaseVersionIteration)`. | ||
| * In [src/Framework/test/TestData.cs](/src/Framework/test/TestData.cs), update `ListedTargetingPackAssemblies` by incrementing the AssemblyVersion of all aspnetcore assemblies by 1 major version. Once dotnet/runtime updates their AssemblyVersions, we also need to update those in this file. They typically make that change at the same time as their TFM update, but we change our AssemblyVersions as soon as we update branding. | ||
| * Add entries to [nuget.config](/nuget.config) for the new Major Version's feed. This just means copying the current feeds (e.g. `dotnet7` and `dotnet7-transport`) and adding entries for the new feeds (`dotnet8` and `dotnet8-transport`). Make an effort to remove old feeds here at the same time. | ||
| * In [src/ProjectTemplates/Shared/TemplatePackageInstaller.cs](/src/ProjectTemplates/Shared/TemplatePackageInstaller.cs), add entries to `_templatePackages ` for `Microsoft.DotNet.Web.ProjectTemplates` and `Microsoft.DotNet.Web.Spa.ProjectTemplates` matching the new version. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a validation that you can run after this point to make sure you did everything right? I assume a full test run is sufficient enough validation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point on validation - full test run is generally sufficient, though you should also check that the build produces packages with the new version. I'll add that.
docs/UpdatingMajorVersionAndTFM.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Updating TFM | ||
|
|
||
| Once dotnet/runtime has updated their TFM, we update ours in the dependency update PR ingesting that change. We won't be able to ingest new dotnet/runtime dependencies in `main` until this is done. For an example, [this](https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/pull/36328) is the PR where we updated our TFM to `net7.0`. This step can be tricky - we have workarounds in [eng/tools/GenerateFiles/Directory.Build.targets.in](/eng/tools/GenerateFiles/Directory.Build.targets.in) to make the build work before we get an SDK containing runtime bits with the new TFM. We copy the `KnownFrameworkReference`, `KnownRuntimePack`, and `KnownAppHostPack` from the previous TFM, give them the incoming runtime dependency versions, and give them the new TFM. This allows us to build against the new TFM before we get an SDK with a reference to it, but there are often problems that arise in this area. The best way to debug build errors related to FrameworkReferences it to get a binlog of a failing project (`dotnet build /bl`) and look at the inputs to the task that failed. Confirm that the `Known___` items look as expected (there is an entry with the current TFM & the current dotnet/runtime dependency version), and look at the source code of the task in [dotnet/sdk](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk) for hints. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see my earlier question is answered in the first sentence. Might help to preview this point earlier for the impatient reader 🤪 but not necessary.
docs/UpdatingMajorVersionAndTFM.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Ingesting an SDK with the new TFM | ||
|
|
||
| Typically we update the SDK we use in `main` every Monday. Once we have one that contains a runtime using the new TFM, we can update [eng/tools/RepoTasks/RepoTasks.csproj](/eng/tools/RepoTasks/RepoTasks.csproj), [eng/tools/RepoTasks/RepoTasks.tasks](/eng/tools/RepoTasks/RepoTasks.tasks), and [eng/helix/content/RunTests/RunTests.csproj](/eng/helix/content/RunTests/RunTests.csproj) to use `DefaultNetCoreTargetFramework` again rather than hard-coding the previous TFM. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you meant to undo the workarounds with the KnownX attributes at this point or is that something that sticks around even after an SDK update?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, those stick around - those particular workarounds no-op unless we're using an SDK that doesn't know about the new TFM yet
|
@captainsafia updated for feedback (thanks!) |
| 1. Add references to [src/SiteExtensions/LoggingAggregate/src/Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension/Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.csproj](/src/SiteExtensions/LoggingAggregate/src/Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension/Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.csproj) to `Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.{PreviousMajorVersion}.0.x64` and `Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.{PreviousMajorVersion}.0.x86`. | ||
| 2. Add entries in [eng/Versions.props](/eng/Versions.props) similar to [these](https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/216c92b78bce31d5e81a70b589707ec2ae5ab21a/eng/Versions.props#L224-L226) - the version should be from the latest released build of .Net. | ||
| 3. Add entries in [eng/Dependencies.props](/eng/Dependencies.props) similar to [these](https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/a47c0a58d7002b9a530c67532366b9db96d73cc6/eng/Dependencies.props#L119-L120). | ||
| * Update AssemblyVersions for dotnet/runtime assemblies in [src/Framework/test/TestData.cs](/src/Framework/test/TestData.cs). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mention need to update the template configuration in the dotnet/spa-templates repo and to pick up the new commit in dotnet/aspnetcore. That must happen after other dotnet/aspnetcore branches stop using dotnet/spa-templates' 'main' branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does updating the template config in spa-templates look like? I didn't do that, did somebody else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You changed the TFM in the SPA templates
|
@dougbu ok, I think this should be good to go now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one nit.
For the future: Please wrap Markdown lines to make it easier to comment on small parts of a paragraph.
|
Merging on red since it's a doc change only |
No description provided.