Improve some large XML comments #44775
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tom-V
requested review from
BrennanConroy,
JamesNK,
Tratcher,
captainsafia and
halter73
as code owners
ghost
added
the
community-contribution
|
Thanks for your PR, @Tom-V. Someone from the team will get assigned to your PR shortly and we'll get it reviewed. |
|
|
captainsafia
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2022
adityamandaleeka
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improve some large XML comments
Improved readability of some XML comment
Description
Improved readability of the XML comments of
IHttpRequestBodyDetectionFeature.CanHaveBodyandJsonTranscodingRouteAdapterFixes #44773
The issue only includes the first change, but looking into the code, I saw the
JsonTranscodingRouteAdaptercould also include some improvements as it also contained a few lists. I also checked the other files within Http.Features, but didn't find any that needed real improvements.