Skip to content

Address outstanding comments on patterns #774

@jskeet

Description

@jskeet

We merged #757 with several comments still open, in order to get the first draft to ECMA members.

This issue is basically a reminder that we should still go through them. Neal, feel free to just resolve any that have been addressed, or @ people for more details if they're insufficient. I'd expect that a single PR could address a bunch of the niggles that were left as comments.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

type: processThis issue relates to processes

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions