Missing using for StreamReader variable

[softwarepronto]

Summary

The example includes:
using WebClient client = new WebClient();
using Stream data = client.OpenRead(args[0]);

But was missing:
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(data);

Fixes #Issue_Number (if available)

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Summary

The example includes:
using WebClient client = new WebClient();
using Stream data = client.OpenRead(args[0]);

But was missing:
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(data);

Fixes #Issue_Number (if available)

Author:	softwarepronto
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-System.Net, community-contribution
Milestone:	-

[opbld31]

Learn Build status updates of commit 1453f9b:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
snippets/csharp/System.Net/WebClient/Overview/useragent.cs	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[softwarepronto]

My goal when changing the documentation is to change as little as possible. The Close methods were there to start but there was inconsistent use of the using keyword. Also, the Close methods were ordered incorrectly. When I personally code, I explicitly include the Close method such as with Streams. I do not explicitly call Dispose for a class like WebClient which does not implement a Close.

…

On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 12:42 PM Anton Firszov ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In snippets/csharp/System.Net/WebClient/Overview/useragent.cs <#8558 (comment)> : > data.Close(); reader.Close(); Do we still need the explicit Close() calls? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8558 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAZFDFMIID4FT3KU2KFTCTWEWIJHANCNFSM6AAAAAARL2KUKA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[antonfirsov]

I think it would be still better to delete the explicit Close() calls. Since they are functionally equivalent to Dispose() for these types, they are redundant. Leaving the calls could result in confusion, and false conclusions: "Why is the official sample also closing? So it means Dispose() and Close() are not equivalent here?"

[opbld31]

Learn Build status updates of commit 664d8a1:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
snippets/csharp/System.Net/WebClient/Overview/useragent.cs	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[BillWagner]

Thanks for making this change @softwarepronto

I like where this landed. I'll now.