-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
Maintain referential integrity in SelectExpression and prevent multiple visitations #17621
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
61 changes: 61 additions & 0 deletions
61
test/EFCore.Relational.Tests/Query/SelectExpressionTest.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ | ||
| // Copyright (c) .NET Foundation. All rights reserved. | ||
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See License.txt in the project root for license information. | ||
|
|
||
| using System.Collections.Generic; | ||
| using System.Linq.Expressions; | ||
| using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Metadata; | ||
| using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query.SqlExpressions; | ||
| using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.TestUtilities; | ||
| using Xunit; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query | ||
| { | ||
| public class SelectExpressionTest | ||
| { | ||
| [ConditionalFact] | ||
| public void Table_referential_integrity_is_preserved() | ||
| { | ||
| var model = CreateModel(); | ||
| var property = model.FindEntityType(typeof(Foo)).FindProperty("Id"); | ||
| var table = new TableExpression("SomeTable", null, "t"); | ||
| var ordering = new OrderingExpression(new ColumnExpression(property, table, false), true); | ||
|
|
||
| var select = new SelectExpression( | ||
| "s", | ||
| new List<ProjectionExpression>(), | ||
| new List<TableExpressionBase> { table }, | ||
| new List<SqlExpression>(), | ||
| new List<OrderingExpression> { ordering }); | ||
|
|
||
| var visitor = new TableSwitchingExpressionVisitor(); | ||
| var visitedSelect = (SelectExpression)visitor.Visit(select); | ||
| Assert.Same(visitedSelect.Tables[0], ((ColumnExpression)visitedSelect.Orderings[0].Expression).Table); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private class TableSwitchingExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor | ||
| { | ||
| protected override Expression VisitExtension(Expression node) | ||
| { | ||
| if (node is TableExpression tableExpression) | ||
| { | ||
| return tableExpression.VisitedExpression ?? new TableExpression( | ||
| tableExpression.Name + "2", tableExpression.Schema, tableExpression.Alias); | ||
| } | ||
| return base.VisitExtension(node); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| protected IMutableModel CreateModel() | ||
| { | ||
| var builder = RelationalTestHelpers.Instance.CreateConventionBuilder(); | ||
| builder.Entity<Foo>(); | ||
| builder.FinalizeModel(); | ||
| return builder.Model; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private class Foo | ||
| { | ||
| public int Id { get; set; } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No public surface like this. This is just plain wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered this - but we need something that will work for completely external visitors, e.g. provider-added postprocessors (such as the one in the test).
Any specific better ideas? Any feedback on the general approach and on the rest?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PS How was this solved in the old pipeline?Seems like in the old pipeline SelectExpression.VisitChildren could neither mutate the instance nor return a modified copy...