-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
JIT: Treat store in JTRUE block as the ElseOperation in if-conversion #124738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
BoyBaykiller
wants to merge
5
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
BoyBaykiller:if-conv-unconditional-store-to-else-124713
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+91
−36
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a9eccc
* treat store in JTRUE block as ElseOperation
BoyBaykiller e16b809
Merge branch 'main' into if-conv-unconditional-store-to-else-124713
BoyBaykiller 6f8a69e
* have ElseCost be 0 when ElseOperation was already unconditionally e…
BoyBaykiller 6009c10
* fix typo
BoyBaykiller 083b153
* only check immediate predecessor stmt of JTRUE
BoyBaykiller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
targetLclNumis address exposed then these checks are not sufficient.GTF_SIDE_EFFECTneeds to beGTF_GLOB_EFFECTandunusedInThenneeds to also checkGTF_GLOB_REF.Or you can just skip the opt if
targetLclNumis address exposed. It is unlikely to be a common scenario in the diffs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll skip if its address exposed. In that case (3) is no longer an issue. And (2) can be handled explicitly by checking for
GTF_EXCEPT?So like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah wait no. A comma inside
m_condcould still write totargetLclNumI think?