test(Table): add complex bind unit test

[ArgoZhang]

add complex bind unit test

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5345

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

• Added a unit test to verify that complex column binding works correctly in tables.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a new unit test in the TableTest file to validate the complex binding of nested properties within a table column. The changes demonstrate how the complex object property (Foo.Name) is bound and rendered correctly inside a table component using a dynamically constructed column.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added unit test for complex column binding in the Table component	Introduced a new test method 'Table_ComplexColumn_Ok' to verify the proper rendering of nested properties. Configured the test to use dependency injection for localizer services and mock data for the complex object. Rendered the Table component within the BootstrapBlazorRoot and dynamically built a table column with a binding expression. Verified that the table output contains the expected nested property value.	test/UnitTest/Components/TableTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5345	Improve code coverage for Table component unit tests	✅
#5345	Add a unit test for complex column binding in Table component	✅

Possibly linked issues

• test(Table): add complex bind unit test #5345: The PR fixes the issue by adding a unit test to ensure the table column width is correctly handled when binding to complex objects.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding more complex data to the test to ensure it covers a wider range of scenarios.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (97fb12c) to head (a3e9381).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5346   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          644       644           
  Lines        28927     28927           
  Branches      4123      4123           
=========================================
  Hits         28927     28927           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.