Updated login tests.

[AlexSkrypnyk]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced login test scenarios to verify users are redirected to the admin path following successful login before capturing screenshots.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A Behat test feature file was updated to add path assertions before screenshot capture in login scenarios. Two occurrences of "Then I save screenshot" were expanded to include a prior verification step checking that the path equals "/admin".

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Login scenario enhancements tests/behat/features/login.feature	Added path assertion "Then the path should be "/admin"" before screenshot capture in both login scenarios, separating path validation from screenshot steps.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Repetitive, straightforward modification pattern applied consistently across two test scenarios
• No business logic changes; test structure clarification only
• Minimal cognitive load—straightforward assertion ordering

Poem

🐰 Two paths now checked before the lens,
The admin gate stands verified hence,
Screenshots wait till the path is true—
A rabbit's test is crisp and new! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "Updated login tests" refers to a real aspect of the changeset—the login test feature file was indeed modified—making it partially related to the change. However, the term "Updated" is non-descriptive and does not convey meaningful information about what was actually changed. The main modification in this changeset is adding path assertions (verifying "/admin" path) before screenshot captures in the login scenarios, but this critical detail is completely absent from the title. A teammate scanning the git history would not understand the specific nature of the update or its purpose without reviewing the full changeset.	Consider revising the title to be more specific about the key change, such as "Add path assertions to login test scenarios" or "Update login tests to verify admin path before screenshot". This would clearly communicate the primary objective of the changeset and help other developers understand the change at a glance.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/update-behat-tests-asserts

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71cc7c8 and ee189a8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• .vortex/installer/tests/Fixtures/install/_baseline/tests/behat/features/login.feature is excluded by !.vortex/installer/tests/Fixtures/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/behat/features/login.feature (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

tests/behat/features/**/*.feature

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/behat/features/**/*.feature: All Behat feature files must include the required user story header: 'As a …', 'I want to …', 'So that …'.
Prefix all test data content with [TEST] and avoid real names (e.g., use '[TEST] Page Title', numbered topics).

Files:

• tests/behat/features/login.feature

🧠 Learnings (4)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: CR
Repo: drevops/vortex PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z
Learning: Applies to tests/behat/features/**/*.feature : All Behat feature files must include the required user story header: 'As a …', 'I want to …', 'So that …'.

Learnt from: CR
Repo: drevops/vortex PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z
Learning: Applies to tests/behat/features/**/*.feature : Prefix all test data content with [TEST] and avoid real names (e.g., use '[TEST] Page Title', numbered topics).

📚 Learning: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: drevops/vortex PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z
Learning: Applies to tests/behat/features/**/*.feature : All Behat feature files must include the required user story header: 'As a …', 'I want to …', 'So that …'.

Applied to files:

• tests/behat/features/login.feature

📚 Learning: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: drevops/vortex PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z
Learning: Applies to tests/behat/features/**/*.feature : Prefix all test data content with [TEST] and avoid real names (e.g., use '[TEST] Page Title', numbered topics).

Applied to files:

• tests/behat/features/login.feature

📚 Learning: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: drevops/vortex PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T10:21:46.183Z
Learning: Applies to .claude/artifacts/behat-steps.txt : Use the cached Behat step definitions file at .claude/artifacts/behat-steps.txt and do not regenerate unless requested.

Applied to files:

• tests/behat/features/login.feature

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (13)

• GitHub Check: build (1)
• GitHub Check: build (0)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-deployment (1)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-workflow (0)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-workflow (1)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-workflow (3)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-workflow (4)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-deployment (0)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-workflow (2)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-common
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-installer (8.3)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-installer (8.4)
• GitHub Check: vortex-test-installer (8.2)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

tests/behat/features/login.feature (2)

12-13: LGTM! Good practice to assert navigation state before screenshot.

Adding the path assertion before capturing the screenshot ensures that the test validates successful navigation to the admin page. This improves test reliability and debugging.

---

19-20: LGTM! Consistent improvement applied to both scenarios.

The same path assertion pattern is correctly applied to the JavaScript scenario, maintaining consistency with the non-JavaScript scenario above.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 64.05%. Comparing base (3b22b25) to head (ee189a8).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2070   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    64.05%   64.05%           
========================================
  Files           92       92           
  Lines         5692     5692           
  Branches        44       44           
========================================
  Hits          3646     3646           
  Misses        2046     2046           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.