Skip to content

Conversation

@nsineok
Copy link
Contributor

@nsineok nsineok commented May 6, 2025

Checklist before requesting a review

  • Subject includes ticket number as [#123] Verb in past tense.
  • Ticket number #123 added to description
  • Added context in Changed section
  • Self-reviewed code and commented in commented complex areas.
  • Added tests for fix/feature.
  • Relevant tests run and passed locally.

Changed

  1. Created a separate configuration file with metatag settings for the Page node type.
  2. Created a behat test scenario to check default metatags presence on the Page node view.

Screenshots

2025-05-06_17-16

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added default metatag settings for CivicTheme Page content types, including dynamic description tags based on page summaries.
  • Tests

    • Introduced automated tests to verify that CivicTheme Pages display the correct SEO-related metatags by default, such as title, description, and canonical tags.
    • Updated user role conditions in analytics tracking tests to reflect specific permissions for site administration.

df-nikita added 2 commits May 6, 2025 16:44
…tent type. Reason: missing <description> because of missing body field.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2025

Walkthrough

A new metatag defaults configuration for the "CivicTheme Page" content type has been added, specifying how meta descriptions are generated dynamically. Additionally, a Behat feature test was introduced to verify that these default metatags, including title, description, and canonical link, are correctly rendered on CivicTheme Page content. The existing tracking feature test was updated to change the user login condition for verifying the absence of Google Analytics 4 scripts.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
config/default/metatag.metatag_defaults.node__civictheme_page.yml Added configuration for default metatags on CivicTheme Page content type, including dynamic description sourcing.
tests/behat/features/metatags.feature Added Behat feature test to check presence and correctness of default metatags on CivicTheme Page content.
tests/behat/features/tracking.feature Modified scenario to log in a user with specific permissions instead of the "authenticated" role for GA4 script test.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Drupal
    participant MetatagModule

    User ->> Drupal: Request CivicTheme Page
    Drupal ->> MetatagModule: Retrieve metatag defaults for node__civictheme_page
    MetatagModule ->> Drupal: Provide metatags (title, description, canonical)
    Drupal ->> User: Serve page with metatags in HTML
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant BehatTest
    participant Drupal
    participant MetatagModule

    BehatTest ->> Drupal: Create CivicTheme Page with summary
    BehatTest ->> Drupal: Visit created page as anonymous user
    Drupal ->> MetatagModule: Retrieve metatag defaults
    MetatagModule ->> Drupal: Provide metatags
    Drupal ->> BehatTest: Return page HTML with metatags
    BehatTest ->> BehatTest: Assert presence of title, description, canonical tags
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f35ad60 and 72bc310.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/behat/features/tracking.feature (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/behat/features/tracking.feature (1)

14-14:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Login condition updated with more specific permissions.

The scenario now uses specific administrative permissions instead of the generic "authenticated" role. This change makes the test more precise by verifying that users with administrative capabilities don't see Google Analytics tracking scripts.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other tracking-related tests that might need similar updates
rg -A 1 -B 1 "I am logged in as a user with" --type feature

Length of output: 93


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Recursively search for login steps in all .feature files to catch any remaining uses
rg -n --glob '*.feature' 'I am logged in as a user with'

Length of output: 733


Tracking tests updated — no further changes needed

The login step in tests/behat/features/tracking.feature now uses specific administrative permissions. A search across all *.feature files found no other tracking-related scenarios still using a generic login step, so no additional updates are required.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80e6b34 and 906605b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/default/metatag.metatag_defaults.node__civictheme_page.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/metatags.feature (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
config/default/metatag.metatag_defaults.node__civictheme_page.yml (1)

1-8:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Confirm whether additional metatags are needed.

The configuration only defines the description metatag, but standard SEO best practices typically include other tags like title and canonical URL that are being tested in the Behat feature. If these are inherited from a parent configuration, that's fine, but it's worth confirming.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if other metatag configurations exist that might provide default values
echo "Checking for parent metatag configurations:"
fd 'metatag.metatag_defaults' --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -v "node__civictheme_page" | grep -E "title|canonical"

# List content types to verify CivicTheme Page definition
echo -e "\nListing content types configurations:"
fd 'node.type.civictheme_page' --type f

Length of output: 775


No additional metatags needed – inherited from global defaults

I’ve checked the other metatag.metatag_defaults.* configurations and confirmed that both title and canonical_url are defined in the global defaults, so this content‐type override only needs to specify description. No further tags are required here; inheritance will satisfy the Behat feature tests.

tests/behat/features/metatags.feature (1)

1-16: LGTM: Well-structured BDD test.

The feature file follows good BDD practices with clear tags, feature description, background setup, and scenario steps. The test properly creates test content and verifies it from an anonymous user's perspective.

uuid: 9510eb68-5939-4944-9151-fe114b68ea88
langcode: en
status: true
dependencies: { }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding dependencies.

Typically, a content type-specific metatag configuration would have dependencies on the content type itself. This helps Drupal track configuration dependencies correctly.

- dependencies: {  }
+ dependencies:
+   config:
+     - node.type.civictheme_page

Comment on lines 1 to 16
@seo @metatags
Feature: Page content metatags
As a site user, I want to verify all default metatags appear for CivicTheme Page content type

Background:
Given civictheme_page content:
| title | status | field_c_n_summary |
| Test Metatags Page | 1 | This is a test summary for metatags testing |

@api
Scenario: CivicTheme page content type contains default metatags
Given I am an anonymous user
When I visit civictheme_page "Test Metatags Page"
Then the response should contain "<title>Test Metatags Page | "
And the response should contain "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This is a test summary for metatags testing\""
And the response should contain "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\""
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider including additional important metatags.

The test verifies title, description, and canonical URL, which are essential. However, you might want to consider testing other important metatags like robots, og:title, og:description, etc., if they're expected to be present by default.

Scenario: CivicTheme page content type contains default metatags
Given I am an anonymous user
When I visit civictheme_page "Test Metatags Page"
Then the response should contain "<title>Test Metatags Page | "
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Make title assertion more specific.

The current title assertion checks for the beginning of the title tag but doesn't verify the complete title. Consider making this more specific by including the site name or using a regex pattern to match the entire title format.

- Then the response should contain "<title>Test Metatags Page | "
+ Then the response should contain "<title>Test Metatags Page | Site Name</title>"

Alternatively, use a more flexible regex approach:

Then the response should match "/<title>Test Metatags Page \| .+<\/title>/"

When I visit civictheme_page "Test Metatags Page"
Then the response should contain "<title>Test Metatags Page | "
And the response should contain "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This is a test summary for metatags testing\""
And the response should contain "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\""
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Enhance canonical URL assertion.

The current assertion only checks for the presence of a canonical tag but not its actual value. Consider strengthening this test by verifying the complete URL.

- And the response should contain "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\""
+ And the response should contain "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http://localhost/test-metatags-page\""

Or use a pattern matching approach if the domain varies across environments:

And the response should match "/<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"[^\"]+\/test-metatags-page\"/"

@nsineok nsineok requested a review from AlexSkrypnyk May 6, 2025 15:09
@nsineok nsineok added the Needs review Pull request needs a review from assigned developers label May 6, 2025
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk merged commit f574d88 into develop May 6, 2025
7 checks passed
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk deleted the feature/page_metatag branch May 6, 2025 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs review Pull request needs a review from assigned developers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants