Skip to content

fix: update README and service configuration for installation clarity#72

Merged
ZR233 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-doc
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

fix: update README and service configuration for installation clarity#72
ZR233 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-doc

Conversation

@ZR233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ZR233 ZR233 commented Apr 2, 2026

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 2, 2026 08:12
@ZR233 ZR233 merged commit aed0bea into main Apr 2, 2026
3 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Improves ostool-server installation clarity and packaging by documenting the web UI build prerequisites and aligning systemd/service tooling with the server’s default config location.

Changes:

  • Document Node.js + pnpm prerequisites for cargo install (web UI build during crate build).
  • Allow systemd service write access to /etc/ostool-server (for config creation/updates under hardened settings).
  • Ensure install script status messaging doesn’t corrupt the downloaded unit template output; update crate readme path to the crate-local README.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
ostool-server/scripts/ostool-server.service Adds /etc/ostool-server to ReadWritePaths to support config writes under systemd sandboxing.
ostool-server/scripts/install.sh Sends template-download status message to stderr so stdout remains valid unit content.
ostool-server/README.md Adds explicit Node.js/pnpm prerequisite docs for successful cargo install.
ostool-server/Cargo.toml Points crate metadata readme to ostool-server/README.md for correct packaging/rendering.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants