Updating to remove the fraud report content

[marcusljf]

Removed the content and image reference since the feature is removed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation

• Removed the "Fraud report" event type from the fraud event types reference.
• Updated applicant guidance: changed wording to "masked email address" for low-risk flags and removed the fraud-suspicion rejection checkbox instruction and its accompanying screenshot.
• Minor copyfix: corrected duplicated word in a table description.

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Dub	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Mar 30, 2026, 4:36 PM

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fa1dda80-00ef-4f15-ab14-fc1d5289063b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef1f0bd and b369fd4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• help/article/fraud-detection.mdx
• help/article/program-applications.mdx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed the "Fraud report" row from the Fraud event types table, changed wording from “anonymized” to “masked” for applicant email in risk flags, and removed the fraud-suspicion rejection instruction plus its associated screenshot reference.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Fraud Detection doc help/article/fraud-detection.mdx	Deleted the “Fraud report” row from the “Fraud event types” table; fixed a duplicated word elsewhere.
Program Applications doc help/article/program-applications.mdx	Changed “anonymized” → “masked” for email in Low risk applicant flags; removed fraud-suspicion rejection checkbox instruction and the related rejection modal screenshot/frame.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 I nibbled a line, then hopped through the prose,
A “report” took a leap and quietly goes,
Emails now masked, a tiny tidy fix,
Screenshots tucked away — a soft doc remix. 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately reflects the main changes: removing fraud report content from two documentation files as described in the PR objectives.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch rejection-mar30

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}